FEEDBACK
Jump to content

Back
Document Abstract
Published: 1 Oct 2009

Vote-buying and political behavior: estimating and explaining vote-buying's effect on turnout in Kenya

Kenya and vote-buying: analysing the effects
View full report

Vote-buying has and continues to be pervasive in many electoral regimes. Yet the relationship between vote-buying and citizen behavior, particularly in the context of the secret ballot, remains largely unknown. In this paper the author studies vote-buying’s effect on voter turnout in Kenya, using a nationally representative survey that includes questions about the country's 2002 presidential and parliamentary elections. However, estimating the causal effect of vote-buying on voter turnout is complicated by the strategic nature of vote-buying, and so this study also examines the strategic logic of vote-buying in Kenya.

This paper provides the following findings:

  • Vote-buying has no effect on the probability that a highly educated person will vote, even though vote-buyers target such individuals at rates similar to those who are less educated. Those with no formal education, on the other hand, appear to be most affected by vote-buying
  • While education might be predictive of an individual's decision to vote, so too might be their economic condition. As suggested, poorer voters might be more susceptible to vote-buying because even small transfers are valuable to them
  • In amplifying both the perceived probability of being discovered of non-compliance and the perceived costs of non-compliance, vote-buying would then influence the decision-making calculus of potential voters, making them more likely to turnout.

The paper also provides implications and conclusions such as:

  • Pre-election material benefits, in the form of vote-buying, are central to understanding why people vote in Kenya and Kenya's 2002 presidential and parliamentary elections provide robust support for the notion that vote-buying influences an individual's decision to vote
  • Political parties in Kenya were active in monitoring voter behavior, and also statistical evidence suggests that exposure to vote-buying greatly increases the probability that an individual feels that parties can exert pressure on their vote choice and that parties are involved in violence
  • Exposure to vote-buying increases an individual's perception of party monitoring and punishment capacity, a perception likely to affect decision-making about whether to vote and is positively associated with individual perception of politician credibility.
View full report

Authors

E. Kramon

Publisher Information

Focus Countries

Geographic focus

Amend this document

Help us keep up to date