an Eldis Resource
Ten reasons why the Rockefeller and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations’ Alliance for another green revolution will not solve the problems of poverty and hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa
Will a second Green Revolution really solve Africa's problems?
Authors:
E. Holt-Gimenez; M. Altieri; P. Rosset
Publisher:
Institute for Food and Development Policy , 2008
This article analyses the effectiveness of the investment that the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation recently announced - a joint ‘Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa’ (AGRA). The authors argue that, based on the first Green Revolution experience, this initiative will not succeed because:
- The Green Revolution actually deepens the divide between rich and poor farmers.
- Over time, Green Revolution technologies degrade tropical agro-ecosystems and increase environmental risk.
- The Green Revolution leads to the loss of agro-biodiversity.
- Hunger is not primarily due to a lack of food, but rather because the hungry are too poor to buy the food that is available.
- Without addressing structural inequities in the market and political systems, approaches relying on high input technologies fail.
- The private sector alone will not solve the problems.
- Genetic engineering (GE) will make Sub-Saharan smallholder systems more environmentally vulnerable.
- GE crops into smallholder agriculture will likely lead to farmer indebtedness.
- The assertion that “There Is No Alternative” (TINA) ignores the many successful agro-ecological and non-corporate approaches to agricultural development.
- AGRA’s “alliance” does not allow peasant farmers to be the principal actors in agricultural improvement.



