Jump to content

an Eldis Resource

Role of multilateral and regional trade disciplines: Kyrgyzstan’s experience

Accession to WTO is not a panacea to economic problems

Authors: R. Mogilevsky
Publisher: Center for Social and Economic Research in Kyrgyzstan,, Kyrgyzstan, 2004

This paper analyzes the process of Kyrgyzstan’s WTO accession and its impact on the republic’s economy and foreign trade balance.

The author’s main finding is that the republic’s accession to the WTO did not improve the country’s imports and exports and did not lead to a significant increase in FDI. As a matter of fact, FDI fell by approximately 30% from 1998 to 2000 (a subsequent increase in FDI is attributed to FDI from non-WTO countries: Russia and Kazakhstan). There is also no evidence that WTO accession affected Kyrgyzstan’s shadow economy (especially remittances sent by Kyrgyz laborers working in Russia, estimated at 25-50% of the country’s official exports).

On the other hand, the transition to the VAT destination principle, mandated by the WTO, had a positive impact on budget revenue, as VAT on imports provides the largest share of taxes collected in the republic. Equalization of import and domestic excise rates also had a positive effect on budget revenues.

According to the author, the changes in the republic’s balance of trade are mainly attributed to non-WTO factors:

The author concludes that the effects of WTO membership were secondary to other developments in the economy, as exports and imports continued to decline. The author notes that a significant increase in the export of Kyrgyz goods on the world market would require more than a removal of barriers to trade. Some of the problems that must be addressed include:

Summary originally provided by GDNet, an Eldis content partner