Pension Reform: Is There a Tradeoff between Efficiency and Equity?
But traditional social security systems have been justified on the grounds that they are equitable and redistribute to low income groups. Are we in danger of exchanging equity for efficiency?
James argues that in fact traditional systems produce many inequities, both within cohorts and across cohorts. So it is possible for pension reform to improve both equity and efficiency - a winwin situation rather than a trade-off. The reforms undertaken thus far have indeed reduced existing equity problems, but some old equity problems remain and some new ones have been created.
The main policy lesson is this: Pension reforms should be carefully designed to improve equity as well as efficiency and growth. Only further empirical analyses will determine whether the redistributional goal has been achieved.
This paper - a product of the Poverty and Human Resources Division, Policy Research Department - was prepared for the Conference on Inequality Reducing Growth in Latin America's Market Economies, Inter-American Development Bank, January 1997. Copies of this paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Selina Khan, room N8024, telephone 2024733651, fax 2025221153, Internet address skhan8@worldbank.org. (24 pages)
The full report is available on the World Bank FTP server



