FEEDBACK
Jump to content

Document Abstract
Published: 1 Jun 2011

Integrating protected areas into climate planning

Maximising climate change resilience, adaptation and mitigation through locating new protected areas
View full report

Though protected areas have increased considerably over the last 130 years, there are several troubling trends, including national and regional disparities, ecological gaps, a decline in the growth of new protected areas, and problems with ineffective management. However, society increasingly expects protected areas to provide an expanded array of benefits, including climate mitigation, resilience and adaptation. This paper discusses the integration of protected areas into climate planning.

The article argues that despite the overall growth in protected area coverage, the reality is that:
  • there are great disparities in the world’s protected area estate
  • the rapid growth of protected areas is not uniform across countries reflecing several underlying factors
  • whereas growth of marine protected areas has been impressive, much of this gain can be attributed to a relatively small number of very large marine reserves
  • there has been a marked decline in the rate of growth for terrestrial protected areas in the last decade
  • legal designation of an area as protected does not always ensure effective management.
The paper poses the following questions for policy makers in relation to the maximisation of climate change resilience, adaptation and mitigation.
  • Where should new protected areas be located?
  • How should protected areas be managed?
  • What factors and policies are necessary?
The article suggests the following policy direction:
  • a robust and compatible policy environment is essential for an effective protected area system
  • planners should assess the economic value of protected areas in relation to climate change
  • protected area policy makers should explicitly link protected areas into national climate change planning
  • planners should take advantage of climate funding to improve the enabling environment by advocating for restoring degraded key protected areas
  • planners should incorporate climate change into ecological gap assessments and consider climate-related design features in the layout of new protected areas
  • planners can better integrate protected area planning into sectoral planning such as transportation, energy and invasive species; assess and communicate the full economic value of protected areas in addressing climate-related issues and ensure that protected areas are an integral part of climate adaptation planning.
The paper concludes that although there are potential tradeoffs between managing protected areas for biodiversity and for climate, the overwhelming social, economic and ecological benefits of protected areas make them a natural and cost-effective investment.
View full report

Authors

J. Ervin (ed)

Amend this document

Help us keep up to date

In collaboration with