Why we need to work more effectively in fragile states

This paper lays out DfID’s commitment to working more effectively in fragile states. A working definition of fragile states is outlined as "where the government cannot or will not deliver core functions to the majority of its people, including the poor…DFID does not limit its definition of fragile states to those affected by conflict".

The report argues that fragile states have not received adequate or effective attention to date. It argues:

Fragile states matter because:

• poverty in fragile states is widespread, and tackling poverty in fragile states will be essential for meeting the MDGs
• fragile states can destabilise regional and global security
• the costs of late response to crisis are high

To date, aid has not reduced poverty in fragile states due to

• not enough aid has been given. Since the mid-1990s emphasis on rewarding states with good governance, fragile states have received 43% less aid than would have been appropriate given the extent of poverty within them
• aid is delivered at the wrong time
• aid is delivered in ineffective ways, including the following problems:
  • too much aid is delivered as uncoordinated projects
  • fragile states cannot meet donor terms and conditions
  • fragile states have difficulty absorbing large amounts of aid

The report outlines how donors can improve how they work in fragile states, including introducing better early warning systems and understanding the political economy better. It argues that delivering aid in fragile states requires:

• better coordination
• "Good enough" governance
• prioritising governance reforms in fragile states, particularly:
  • failure to protect people and their property
  • security sector reform
  • public financial management
• improving service delivery
• protecting and promoting livelihoods

In addition, the paper outlines 12 specific priorities for DfID to improve how it works in fragile states.