Recent trends in the development agenda of Latin America: an analysis of conditional cash transfers
From this assessment, it is found that that:
- some of the key factors shaping policy processes were political stability, bureaucratic implications, international pressure and leverage, as well as technical advice
- CCTs ranked fairly well with political feasibility, but still had a number of unresolved administrative and operational issues
- some of the targeting methods were seriously flawed
- while they have contributed to empowering women and generating multiplier effects in local economies, they also entailed significant private and social costs at the household and community levels
- CCTs were not percieved as effective safety nets for emergency situations
- these cash transfers were able to tackle several problems in a single policy response - through combining income transfers with demand-side incentives for long-run human capital accumulation.
In conclusion, the author recommends that governments ought to consider their own country specificities carefully before adopting CCTs indiscriminately; in that if a countrys macroeconomic model perpetuates inequality, limits productive investment, restricts employment and generates poverty, CCTs end up functioning as a mere relief measure with localised impacts. [adapted from author]




