Please note - this article was originally published on the id21 website which has now closed. This and other articles produced by id21 were archived by Eldis in 2009 and are not actively maintained. If you find links and references which are no longer valid please email eldis@ids.ac.uk.
In today’s wars, the line between perpetrator and victim, combatant and civilian, is becoming more and more blurred. In particular the roles played by women are increasingly diverse. Reality does not support the perception that women are always vulnerable. In Rwanda, for instance, women participated in horrific acts in the genocide, while in other conflicts women may act as spies or as combatants.
This International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) study seeks to clarify such distinctions by analyzing laws governing situations of armed conflict and assessing their adequacy. The report also analyses the impact of ICRC activities and offers suggestions for enhancing the assistance and protection afforded to women during war.
Most women's needs are adequately covered by international humanitarian law (IHL) and human rights law, the report asserts. The Geneva Convention, for example, prohibits the execution of the death penalty for pregnant women and mothers with dependent infants. Women thus benefit from additional specific rules. The law, however, is not always respected or implemented by parties to conflict. In some cases, it is impossible to gain access to the population in need, while in others lack of funds makes compliance by authorities impossible. While international humanitarian law binds all parties to an armed conflict (both government and armed opposition groups), the traditional view is that non-State actors (such as opposition groups) are not bound by human rights norms. This view is increasingly subject of debate.
The study, begun in 1998, assesses the needs of women in situations of armed conflict, the impact of ICRC programmes on issues such as physical safety, sexual violence, displacement and healthcare. A key finding is that much more could be done to curb sexual violence, including strenghtenedstrengthened dissemination among arms bearers on the prohibition of sexual violence.
Further findings include:
Policy implications include the need for the ICRC to:
Source(s):
'Women Facing War' executive summary, International Committee of the Red
Cross (ICRC), October 2001
Funded by: ICRC
id21 Research Highlight: 1 February 2002
Further Information:
Charlotte Lindsey
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
19 Avenue de la Paix
1202 Geneva
Switzerland
Tel:
+41 22 730 27 73
Contact the contributor: clindsey.gva@icrc.org
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
Other related links:
'Victims or partners? Working with women to rebuild the Balkans'
'Women building peace'
A Summary of United Nations Agreements on Human Rights
Urgent Action Fund promotes the human rights of women and girls with a
focus on armed conflict
Saving Women's Lives Fact Sheet: Women’s Reproductive Health & Armed
Conflict
See further publications by Women, Ink on Armed Conflict and the Peace
Process