Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

Is cooking a waste of energy? Promoting more efficient household stoves

In many developing countries governments, donors, NGOs and academics have promoted the use of fuel-efficient stoves (in order to reduce health effects, environmental degradation and household expenditure on traditional fuels). In Kenya and Ethiopia such promotional programmes have been very successful. Why have programmes elsewhere had only limited success? What are the potential poverty alleviation impacts of household biomass stove programmes? How can production and uptake be boosted?

A report from Energy for Sustainable Development (ESD) draws on research conducted among stove producers and users in Addis Ababa, Nairobi and Kampala to draw out the factors which make for sustainably commercialised stove production. It calls on African governments to promote a proven and sustainable technology which delivers significant environmental, health and economic benefits.

Both stove producers and consumers in Ethiopia and Kenya have generally benefitted. Metal working and ceramics have traditionally been low status occupations in Ethiopia. Income from the new enterprise has improved the status, diet, standard of living, health and educational levels of marginalised people hitherto trapped by very poor returns on their labour. Most consumers report they have saved money and improved domestic air quality.

Neither the Ethiopian nor the Kenyan programmes would have been successful without substantial initial government and donor backing. Improved stoves were consciously targeted at upper income consumers as a way of achieving sustainable commercial penetration within the lifetime of donor supported programmes. The approach succeeded, demand spread to all social classes, more producers entered the market, and today the improved stoves business is solely driven by demand.

On the other hand in Uganda, despite donors’ and government’s financial efforts, consumers never showed interest in improved stoves. A greater variety of stoves have entered the marketplace. Mostly bought by the poorest in anticipation of cost savings, the better off have (unlike in Kenya and Ethiopia) shown marginal interest. Volumes have been low with few demonstrable poverty alleviation benefits and a market has never developed.

The study cites evidence that stove quality has deteriorated as price competition has led producers to cut costs to remain competitive. Whereas improved Kenyan stoves tested in the 1980s consumed 30-50 per cent less charcoal than conventional ones, today this is down to 24 per cent. Consumers do not usually notice the recent drop in stove efficiency but have noted a decline in appearance and robustness. This was particularly true in Uganda and led to a loss of confidence in the product.

Other findings include:

As the market has taken off, women clay liner producers have seen returns on production plummet and their economic power vis-á-vis stove assemblers steadily weaken.
Ugandan stove programmes have been top-down, donor-driven and ignored the importance of creating consumer awareness.

The report has country-specific and Africa-wide recommendations. Donors and policymakers are urged to:

support public information campaigns: acceptance by all social classes is needed to drive up quality and availability and keep prices low
encourage extensive product testing and research into improved designs and ensure that findings are disseminated
support producers entering the stove business by providing training, credit and technical and marketing advice
encourage production outside capital cities and investigate the viability of peri-urban and rural markets
provide ongoing assistance to producers’ organisations in order to avoid reduction in product quality.

Source(s):
‘Poverty reduction aspects of successful improved household stoves programmes: final summary report’, Energy for Sustainable Development, by Mike Bess October 2000 Full document.

Funded by: DFID (IUDD)

id21 Research Highlight: 8 May 2002

Further Information:
Mike Bess
Energy for Sustainable Development Ltd (ESD)
Overmoor Farm, Neston
Corsham
Wiltshire SN13 9TZ
UK

Tel: +44 (0) 1225 816806
Fax: +44 (0) 1225 812102
Contact the contributor: mike@esd.co.uk

Energy for Sustainable Development Ltd, UK

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.