Please note - this article was originally published on the id21 website which has now closed. This and other articles produced by id21 were archived by Eldis in 2009 and are not actively maintained. If you find links and references which are no longer valid please email eldis@ids.ac.uk.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) launched the Girls’ and Women’s Initiative to spur advancements in women’s and girls’ education prompted by strong evidence of the impact of girls’ primary school completion on long-term social and economic development. A research programme supported by the initiative in the Terai region of Nepal attempts to find out if increasing women’s literacy skills through non-formal, basic education improves women’s social and economic development.
In Nepal the USAID-supported Girls’ and Women’s Education Policy Research Activity (GWE-PRA) investigated the impact of two integrated literacy programmes by examining changes among women in the following indicators of social and economic status and development:
Research was conducted over a three-year period and results were compared with studies of women that had not had literacy training.
The significant input into curriculum development, training and support from the international donor community has led to a significant increase in women’s status and development. The researchers make the assumption that this impacts positively on a country’s development as a whole. Women that undertook the programme:
Researchers also found that a number of factors increased the chances of women staying in the programme, such as being older and having taken part in previous programmes. However, women with lower levels of social economic status tended to drop out of the programmes at a higher rate than other women, which is a worrying finding as this is the primary group that the programmes are designed to serve. Increasing financial and time costs mean that they are more likely to miss classes and eventually drop out
Because of the significant increase in women’s development at relatively low cost, governments, donors, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) should prioritise their goals and target resources towards women’s literacy programmes. Further implications for policy include:
Source(s):
'A Longitudinal Study of the Effect of Integrated Literacy and Basic
Education Programs on Women’s Participation in Social and Economic Development
in Nepal', Girls' and Womens' Education Policy Research Activity, by Shirley
Burchfield et al December 2002
Funded by: The United States Agency for International Development and the Office of Women and Development (WID)
id21 Research Highlight: 29 October 2004
Further Information:
Shirley Burchfield
World Education
44 Farnsworth Street
Boston MA 02210-1211
USA
Tel:
+1 (617) 482 9485
Fax:
+1 (617) 482 0617
Contact the contributor: sburchfield@worlded.org
Other related links:
'Are literacy classes working for women in Mali?'
'Reading between the lines: why literacy for women?'
'Poor return on investment? Why are literacy programmes failing to reach
the poor?'
'Why eat green cucumbers at the time of dying?: women’s literacy and
development in Nepal' from ELDIS
'Backward and forward linkages that strengthen primary education' from
ELDIS
'Gender and Development' from the World Bank
'The economic role of women in agricultural and rural
development:promoting income-generating activities' from the Technical Centre
for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA)