Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Can family planning be successfully contracted out to the private sector? Would such franchises be sustainable in developing countries? Marie Stopes International (MSI) looked at the experiences of two such initiatives funded by USAID in Mexico and the Philippines. MSI found that social franchising, which is still in its early stages, has the potential to increase access to good quality affordable family planning services. However, the franchises did have problems which would need to be addressed if they were to be implemented effectively.
Franchising has long been used in the commercial sector for the rapid expansion of a business or service. In principal, it allows the quality of the product to be controlled and uses existing resources in the private sector. Entrepreneurs can expand their businesses without requiring large amounts of capital or new staff. For a fee they pass on their business ideas and format to others who operate on a semi-independent basis. Social franchising adapts commercial techniques to achieve social rather than commercial goals. The study found that franchising provided a number of advantages to governments and donors wishing to expand family planning services:
However, there are financial problems with franchising. Start-up costs are high and its success depends on whether people are willing and able to pay for the services. Whilst there is increasing evidence that people are prepared to pay for good quality services, the poorest members of society will always need to be subsidised. The social franchise design in the study required large start-up funds from donors, long-term technical support from US agencies and subsidised contraceptive supplies. Yet ideally the franchises should be self-sustaining in the long term.
The report recommends that for social franchising to be successful:
While social franchising is not the only way of mobilising the private health sector it is a means of encouraging private practices to provide high quality family planning for the first time. However, careful thought must be given as to whether subsidising social franchising is the best use of scarce donor funds.
Source(s):
‘Social franchising reproductive health services: can it work? A review
of the experience’ Marie Stopes International Working Paper 5, by E. Smith,
2002 Full document.
Funded by: UK Department for International Development
id21 Research Highlight: 25 September 2003
Further Information:
Marie Stopes International
153-157 Cleveland Street
London
W1T 6QW
UK
Tel:
44 (0)20 7574 7400
Fax:
44 (0)20 7574 7417
Contact the contributor: msi@stopes.org.uk
Other related links:
'Choice and access: family planning services in Yemen'
>
'Private parts - treatment for STIs in Uganda's private sector'
>
'Body and mind: integrated sexual healthcare for South Asian men'
>
'Double standards – are uninsured patients treated differently by South
Africa’s private GPs?'
>
'Actions speak louder than words – contraceptive services in Pakistan’s
private sector'
>
'Retail therapy – STI treatment in Kenya’s private sector'
>
See id21's collection of links relevant to sexual and reproductive health.