Please note - this article was originally published on the id21 website which has now closed. This and other articles produced by id21 were archived by Eldis in 2009 and are not actively maintained. If you find links and references which are no longer valid please email eldis@ids.ac.uk.
Bangladesh has a high rate of maternal deaths, one of the world’s lowest rates of women using skilled birth attendants and a very low rate of caesarean births. To improve maternal health, a greater proportion of women need access to professional medical care, including caesarean delivery. However, in Bangladesh many women distrust caesarean surgery.
One of the Millennium Development Goals is to reduce by three-quarters the global maternal mortality ratio by 2015. In developing countries, a far higher number of women die from pregnancy-related causes compared with developing countries. In Bangladesh, where an estimated 320 to 440 maternal deaths occur per 100,000 live births, only 2.4 percent of children are delivered by caesarean section, whereas the internationally identified need is between five and 15 percent.
Using a skilled birth attendant during birth is one of the most recommended forms of intervention to reduce maternal deaths in low-income countries. Yet in many regions the proportion of women who do so is low as they face a number of obstacles to seeking professional medical help in childbirth. A major reason that skilled birth attendance is encouraged is that it can lead to women being referred for professional medical help if they are experiencing difficulties during birth or pregnancy. In certain instances, a caesarean section may be needed to save the mother and/or her baby. Many women, however, may not believe a caesarean procedure to be useful.
A study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK, in collaboration with the Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, explored the experiences and views on caesarean sections of 30 women who recently gave birth in a health facility in a rural district of Bangladesh. The research found that:
Bangladeshi women understand the need for professional medical care but it appears that they have good reason not to trust doctors’ advice to have a caesarean delivery. Their fear of caesarean delivery is not simply based in ignorance but may reflect real concerns about medical practice. The study recommends that:
Source(s):
‘Life saving or money wasting? Perceptions of caesarean sections among
users of services in rural Bangladesh’, Health Policy, by Justin Oliver
Parkhurst and Syed Azizur Rahman, 2006 (in press)
HINARI subscribers can access the full-text article here. Full document.
Funded by: UK Department for International Development (DFID)
id21 Research Highlight: 17 November 2006
Further Information:
Justin Oliver Parkhurst
Health Policy Unit
Department of Public Health and Policy
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Keppel Street
London WC1E 7HT
UK
Tel:
+44 20 7927 2359
Fax:
+44 20 7637 5391
Contact the contributor: justin.parkhurst@lshtm.ac.uk
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
Other related links:
'Time-bomb – what factors delay emergency Caesarean sections in Côte
d’Ivoire?'
'Is there a fast track to better pregnancy outcomes in Kenya?'
'How can African anaesthetists cut caesarean section risks?'
'Comparing practice with evidence: obstetric care in government hospitals
in China'
'A cut above the rest? Private healthcare and caesarean sections in Chile'
'Evaluating safe motherhood programmes in Indonesia'