Eldis

Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

Midwives assisting homebirths face opposition in rural Bangladesh

In Bangladesh many women still die during child labour. Many of these deaths occur at home. A trained midwife could prevent many of these deaths. In response, countries in South Asia are now promoting the policy of homebirths supervised by a trained midwife.

The Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, looked at the experiences of midwives attending homebirths in the rural region of Matlab. In Bangladesh, 91 percent of births still take place at home and only 13 percent are assisted by a doctor or midwife. In 1987, almost 20 years ago, a health initiative was introduced in Matlab to allow midwives to attend women in the home.

Researchers conducted interviews and group discussions with 13 midwives in Matlab in 2003 and 2004 to learn what difficulties they faced during their work. The study found midwives experienced many problems conducting home deliveries. The biggest challenges they faced were related to attitudes of the family members who often wanted to maintain traditional childbirth practices. If a complication arose during labour it could take hours or even days to persuade the family to allow the mother to go to a hospital that offered care. Moreover, childbirth was seen as dirty and whoever touched a woman giving birth was viewed as impure. As a result the midwives did not receive the help and respect they expected.

Other difficulties confronting the midwives were:

Midwives felt more comfortable working in a hospital environment. However in the hospital the midwives behaviour was often reported to be inappropriate. Some midwives shouted at and humiliated their patients for screaming during labour, for taking too long to deliver or for refusing to show their genitals. The midwives’ modern attitudes clashed with the traditional values of the families both in the clinic, where the midwives felt more in control, and in the home, where the families were dominant.

The researchers suggest:

Even with these improvements the midwives will face many obstacles during homebirths. Governments should consider carefully whether a clinic or home-based approach is the best option for ensuring skilled birthing care.

Source(s):
‘Attending Home vs. Clinic-Based Deliveries: Perspectives of Skilled Birth Attendants in Matlab, Bangladesh’, Reproductive Health Matters 14(27), pages 51-60, by Lauren S. Blum, Tamanna Sharmin and Carine Ronsmans, 2006

Funded by: United States Agency for International Development (USAID); UK Department for International Development (DFID)

id21 Research Highlight: 3 April 2007

Further Information:
Lauren S. Blum
American Embassy
Kinshasa, Unit 31550
APO, AE 09828
Democratic Republic of the Congo

Tel: +243 810061916
Contact the contributor: laurensblum@yahoo.com

Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B)

Other related links:
'Professional maternity care: scaling up provision in poor countries'

'Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action'

'Life saving or money wasting? What users think of caesarean sections in Bangladesh'

'Midwives’ attitudes to women in labour in Ghana'

'Comparing maternal health services in four countries'

'Doctor or midwife? Effectiveness of midwifery-led maternity care in Nepal'

'Delivering health - perinatal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.