Eldis

Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

Factors influencing infant immunisation coverage in Guinea

Immunisation is a highly cost-effective public health intervention. But immunisation rates are stagnant or falling in most sub-Saharan African countries. The standard approaches of health education and improved vaccine supply may not stop this decline. What other factors shape immunisation delivery and acceptance?

Coverage depends on how vaccine supply and delivery interact with demand for these services. A working paper from the Institute of Development Studies, UK takes an anthropological approach to consider influences on vaccine demand, supply and coverage in the Republic of Guinea. The researchers carried out 1,550 detailed narrative interviews and child health biographies, plus a review of documents, participant observations, group discussions and interviews with health care workers and users in urban and rural settings in Kissidougou and Dinguiraye prefectures.

Immunisation coverage has declined overall since peaking in the mid-1990s. Health centre staff and mobile teams give routine vaccinations. National Vaccination Days deliver polio vaccine. Children who have missed vaccinations may ‘catch up’ when they visit health workers for treatment or through home visits by health workers.

The authors report that:

Improved immunisation rates are essential to efforts to meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals. The authors make several recommendations for policymakers hoping to achieve this:

Source(s):
‘The social dynamics of infant immunisation in Africa: perspective from the Republic of Guinea’, Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Working Paper 262, by Dominique Millimouno, Alpha Ahmadou Diallo, James Fairhead and Melissa Leach, 2006 Full document.
'Making vaccine technologies work for the poor', IDS Policy Briefing Issue 31, May 2006 (PDF)
Also see further papers by the IDS KNOTS Team on immunisation Full document.

Funded by: UK Department for International Development (DFID)

id21 Research Highlight: 29 September 2006

Further Information:
Melissa Leach
KNOTS Team
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE
UK

Contact the contributor: M.Leach@ids.ac.uk

Knowledge, Technology and Society (KNOTS) Team, Institute of Development Studies, UK

Other related links:
'Is more better? BCG revaccination shows no benefit in Brazil'

'Hib vaccination: breakthrough in The Gambia'

'Hepatitis B vaccination in Colombia’s Amazon Basin'

'Adverse effects of mass vaccination in Brazil: the case of MMR'

'Out of order: does the sequence of childhood vaccinations matter?'

'Missed opportunities – measles vaccination in Dhaka, Bangladesh'

'Time will tell - following the effects of hepatitis B vaccination in Gambia'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.