Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
The health benefits of clean drinking water, sanitation facilities and hygienic practices, like hand washing, are well known. But health is rarely the primary motivation for developing water and sanitation facilities, nor is it the health sector that usually pays for them. What are the real costs and benefits for human health of providing these services?
Researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine have analysed the evidence to see whether water, sanitation and hygiene should be funded public health efforts.
The greatest health benefit is the reduction of diarrhoeal diseases, which are major causes of death among children in developing countries. The incidence of other diseases is also reduced, while further benefits are seen in social and mental well-being.
Considering the available evidence on costs and benefits for health, the following findings emerge:
Improving quality and access to water, providing consistently used and maintained basic sanitation, and simple hygiene promotion could reduce the health and socio-economic costs of disease by three to four percent. For the health sector, paying for relatively inexpensive promotion and advocacy, this is very cost-effective, far more so than oral rehydration. In order to achieve and improve on this cost-effectiveness certain principles should be followed:
For most people, the health benefits of these services are secondary to other benefits, for example, time saved in water collection. Users and sectors other than health pay the majority of costs. The health sector can further improve on the health benefits that result through advocacy, regulation and promotion, which have some small costs attached.
Source(s):
‘Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Promotion’, Disease Control
Priorities Project, Working Paper No. 28, by Sandy Cairncross and Vivian
Valdmanis, July 2004 Full document.
Funded by: The Disease Control Priorities Project - a joint effort of The World Bank, the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the World Health Organization.
id21 Research Highlight: 6 June 2005
Further Information:
Sandy Cairncross
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Keppel Street
London WC1E 7HT England
Tel:
+44 (0)20 7927 2637
Fax:
+44 (0)20 7637 4314
Contact the contributor: sandy.cairncross@lshtm.ac.uk
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
Other related links:
The Case for Marketing Sanitation
Patronage, politics and toilets
'Who buys Latrines, Where and Why?' WSP Field Note
Beyond the source: keeping water clean in developing countries
The challenges of financing sanitation