Eldis

Please note - this article was originally published on the id21 website which has now closed. This and other articles produced by id21 were archived by Eldis in 2009 and are not actively maintained. If you find links and references which are no longer valid please email eldis@ids.ac.uk.

A troubling dilemma: capacity building in the midst of conflict

As conflicts rage, is it realistic for the international community to hope to build local capacity? Or should it focus solely on delivering assistance? Are current patterns of north-south interaction helpful in the resolving of humanitarian crises? Can we move away from the compartmentalisation of humanitarian relief into small boxes and short time-frames?

A book by the Humanitarianism and War Project uses case studies from international aid practitioners to locate the trade-offs between outsiders doing what they can to meet people’s needs during a humanitarian emergency and those working to build longer-term capacities among local organisations to deal with their own problems. Detailing considerable confusion and a token commitment to local capacity building by externally-driven relief programmes, it nevertheless finds grounds for optimism.

A review of the literature on capacity building in complex emergencies shows that at times the concept of strengthening local organisations is barely visible. Even when intentions are good, outsiders have difficulty working effectively with local organisations during humanitarian emergencies. The relationship is more often one of patronage than partnership. Training and service delivery is mistakenly equated with capacity building. Understanding and analysis of the local situation is usually limited.

Case studies are written from the perspective of aid recipients. They explore:

A final chapter draws together potential lessons, cross-cutting themes and policy considerations for practitioners, international humanitarian organisations and local civil society organisations working with international agencies. It highlights the need to:

Source(s):
‘Patronage or partnership: local capacity building in humanitarian crises’, Humanitarianism and War Project, Ian Smillie (ed), Kumarian Press, 2001 Full document.

Funded by: International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada

id21 Research Highlight: 9 June 2003

Further Information:
Humanitarianism and War Project
Feinstein International Famine Center
Tufts University
11 Curtis Avenue
Somerville MA 02144
USA

Tel: +1 617 627 5949
Fax: +1 617 627 5952
Contact the contributor: H&w@tufts.edu

Humanitarianism and War Project

Kumarian Press
1294 Blue Hills Avenue
Bloomfield, CT. 06002
USA

Tel: +1 860 243 2098
Fax: +1 860 243 2867
Contact the contributor: kpbooks@aol.com

Kumarian Press, USA

Other related links:
'NGOs and capacity building: for what and for whom?'

'The new humanitarianism: incompatible with ethical accountability?'

'Humanitarianism revisited? Aid vs politics in conflict'

'Politics vs aid?' Insights #39

Capacity.org is dedicated to advancing the policy and practice of capacity development

See the World Bank Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Unit

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.