Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Agricultural and development failure is a key cause of food insecurity, which may lead to conflict. Conversely, agricultural development can contribute to peace and reconstruction by raising incomes and employment and reducing the social frustrations that give rise to violence.
Agriculture, particularly in poor countries, often determines the overall success or failure of development. This in turn influences social peace and conflict. A paper from the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Finland examines the connections between agriculture, development and social peace.
Agriculture not only provides rural populations with food and income, but it also brings in revenue for governments. This can be used for the benefit of the poorer parts of the population, thereby smoothing out inequalities that might exist. Agriculture is critical for countries rebuilding from war, especially in making recovery work for the poor. By raising per capita incomes, agricultural development supports new democracies. Agricultural development therefore supports political strategies for peace-building and democratisation.
However, though agriculture is linked to development, its role in creating social peace is overlooked. Most developing countries under-invest in small-scale agriculture and rural micro-enterprises, and public spending budgets do not reflect the needs of rural people. Foreign aid to poor countries has stagnated and the effectiveness of this aid is reduced by rich-country protectionism (through subsidies and tariffs) in agricultural markets. Such short-sighted trade policy not only hinders development and poverty reduction in the poor world, it also undermines their peace and security.
The author finds that agricultural or developmental failure can lead to conflict in the following ways:
The international community is urged to:
Since conflicts in poor countries have global effects, rich countries undermine their own security by neglecting the lives and livelihoods of the poor.
Source(s):
‘Agricultural development for peace’, UNU World Institute for Development
Economics Research (WIDER), Research Paper No. 2005/07, by Tony Addison,
January 2005 Full document.
id21 Research Highlight: 10 March 2006
Further Information:
Tony Addison
UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER)
Katajanokanlaituri 6 B
00160 Helsinki
Finland
Tel:
+358 9 6159 9214
Fax:
+358 9 6159 9333
Contact the contributor: addison@wider.unu.edu; publications@wider.unu.edu
Other related links:
'Land access in conflict situations: can sustainable livelihoods play a
role?'
'New approaches to land management and security in Africa'
'Agriculture heals the wounds of conflict'
'Land disputes in Afghanistan – is enough being done to end the conflict?'
Agriculture for peace - Research at the Institute of Advanced Studies,
United Nations University