Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
As the number of disasters mounts, is it inevitable that they leave behind a trail of helpless victims dependent on the generosity of a benevolent state or aid agency? Can disaster management be better integrated with development? Perhaps local governments, donors and aid agencies need to realise the importance of a community-based approach to disaster management.
A report from Christian Aid draws on the lessons learned from India’s two most recent major disasters – the Orissa super cyclone and the Gujarat earthquake. Case studies, based on the testimony of local agencies in the world’s most disaster-prone region, prove that community-based disaster prevention and response management can reduce deaths and limit the damage to livelihoods.
In the next 20 years, the global cost of climate-related disasters could be 10 times the value of aid flows. Two-thirds of India is struck regularly by disasters: each year, around 25 million Indians are killed, injured or have their lives blighted by them. Windspeeds of 300 km/hr brought misfortune for 12.7 million people on Orissa’s coast. India’s most devastating earthquake for half a century affected 15 million Gujaratis.
Christian Aid argues that the reason why death tolls and damage are unnecessarily high is due to top-down disaster mitigation and preparedness (DMP) and a directive approach to development planning. Policy-makers learn little from previous disasters. Inefficiency and indifference to risk is found across the political and bureaucratic elite. Disaster response and rehabilitation programmes are externally driven and often riddled with corruption.
There is a community-based DMP alternative:
Lives can be saved by simple means such as constructing cyclone shelters, enforcing building codes, providing local officials with satellite phones, sharing ideas with local people about how to respond and timely broadcasting of warnings. In the aftermath of a catastrophe, sophisticated communications systems may be important, but it is the ‘software’ – awareness, community preparedness and clear, locally-run management systems – that is essential.
Among the many recommendations to strengthen local coping capacities and to ensure that people forced by poverty to live in the path of disaster have a clear and loud voice are:
Source(s):
‘Facing up to the storm: how local communities can cope with disaster’,
Christian Aid, by Tom Palakudiyil and Mary Todd, July 2003 Full document.
Funded by: Christian Aid
id21 Research Highlight: 10 October 2003
Further Information:
Christian Aid
PO Box 100
London SE1 7RT
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)20 7620 4444
Fax:
+44 (0)20 7620 0719
Contact the contributor: info@christian-aid.org
Contact the contributor: mary.todd@virgin.net
Tom Palakudiyil
Christian Aid India
A 15/18 Vasant Vihar
PO Box 100
London SE1 7RT
Tel:
+44 (0)20 7523 2350
Contact the contributor: tpalakudiyil@christian-aid.org
Other related links:
See the Sustainable Environment and Ecological Development Society
More from the Benfield Hazard Research Centre
The Red Cross focuses on people in crisis
'Risks of disaster: the great reversal of human progress?'
'Disasterproofing: reducing the impact of natural disasters'
'Learning to live with natural disasters: roadmap to a safer world?'
'Coping with catastrophe: enhancing community capacity to respond'