Please note - this article was originally published on the id21 website which has now closed. This and other articles produced by id21 were archived by Eldis in 2009 and are not actively maintained. If you find links and references which are no longer valid please email eldis@ids.ac.uk.
Western Equatoria is a focal point for Sudanese refugees returning from neighbouring Uganda, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Large scale returns may compound the already vulnerable conditions of people who stayed in Sudan. Without greater sensitivity, aid could worsen social divisions.
A report from Ockenden International, UK investigates the impact of return of displaced southern Sudanese, how those who have stayed in Sudan perceive returnees, and the potential conflicts between those who stayed, those who fought in the protracted civil war and those who sought refuge outside of Sudan.
The region’s recent history has been dominated by movement. Fighting for towns garrisoned by the Government of Sudan was particularly destructive and led to the separation of many families. When the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) took over there was relative stability. Yet looting, fear of conscription or abduction by the SPLA, and aerial bombing by the GoS had continued to cause displacement.
The massive extent of population movement complicates attempts to define returnees and those who remained. People’s movements are not one-off, neatly measurable events. A returnee may be an internally displaced person, refugee, combatant or abductee. Although the terms are fluid and of little analytical value, they can be potentially divisive for those categorised into definite groups by relief agencies or government authorities. Ideas of ‘return’ and ‘reintegration’ are far from straightforward when so many are ‘returning’ to a new place.
Only a small proportion of refugees have returned to Sudan. There are many threats to stability:
The return of displaced people inevitably brings about profound changes that are likely to raise tensions as well as opportunities. Perceptions of people who remained, about returnees have not received sufficient attention in academic or policy circles. If people in receiving communities see real benefits of peace then sustainable return and reintegration can be achieved. Ockenden International, UK urges the international community to recognise that return and reintegration of displaced people is a complex, long-term process which requires informed assistance.
In South Sudan and other post-conflict regions it is important to:
Source(s):
‘An Uncertain Return: Report on the Current and Potential Impact of
Displaced People Returning to Southern Sudan’, Ockenden International, by Jake
Phelan and Graham Wood (PDF) Full document.
Funded by: UK Department of International Development
id21 Research Highlight: 23 April 2007
Further Information:
Ockenden International
One Crown Square
Church Street East
Woking
Surrey GU21 6HR
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)1483 741316
Fax:
+44 (0)1483 793936
Contact the contributor: oi@ockenden.org.uk
Jake Phelan
Tel:
Fax:
Contact the contributor: jakephelan@hotmail.com
Graham Wood
Tel:
Fax:
Contact the contributor: grahamwood333@aol.com
Other related links:
'Refugees and internally displaced people – policy approaches'
'Is the UNHCR doing its job? Combining refugee relief with local
development in Africa'
'Refugees as remitters: the Dinka of Sudan'
'Water, livelihoods and resettlement of displaced people: lessons from
Eritrea'
id21 displacement links page
Sussex Centre for Migration Research - Defining, measuring and influencing
sustainable return: the case of the Balkans [PDF]