Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Is there too much theorizing about water? Does regarding water as an economic good obscure its cultural, social and symbolic dimensions? Can market forces protect the right of the poor to water?
A report from the Institute of Development Studies casts a critical eye over current research and debate, emphasising the need to address neglected questions of equity and justice. What is the role of water in the everyday lives of real people? Are we really on the verge of a global water ‘crisis’? The report argues against seeing water scarcity in absolute terms. We need to look instead at how local social, institutional and hydrological factors manufacture scarcity.
Are we entitled to water as a human right? The 1986 Convention on the Rights of the Child explicitly says so and activist coalitions want to cement this right in international law. Advocates pressing for water to be declared a human right argue for a minimum daily entitlement of 25 litres - in comparison, per capita daily usage in the USA is 700 litres. The report looks at the feasibility of creating a system of national and international obligations and responsibilities. It argues that rights-based discourses in water are still rather abstract and practicalities still need to be worked out.
More influential is the coalition of water utilities, donors, the World Bank and NGOs who argue that water is an economic good, that it must be paid for and that water and sanitation infrastructure is most efficiently built and managed by public/private partnerships or by market forces. The report cites countervailing evidence that privatisation of water may not necessarily be pro-poor and the track record of state provision not totally negative. Firms focus on rich urban customers and cut off the poor. In a free market there is a risk that pricing mechanisms will tax the poor instead of the rich.
Further findings include:
Among the recommendations are the need to:
Source(s):
‘Water for the twenty-first century: challenges and misconceptions’ by
Lyla Mehta, Institute of Development Studies, Working Paper #111 (2000)
Funded by: Rockefeller Foundation
id21 Research Highlight: 2 May 2001
Further Information:
Lyla Mehta
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Falmer
Brighton BN1 9RE
UK
Tel:
+44 (0) 1273 67 8736
Contact the contributor: lylam@ids.ac.uk
Institute of Development Studies (IDS), UK
Other related links:
'Competing for water: is integrated management an elusive goal?'
WaterAid helps the poorest communities provide themselves with a safe
water supply and adequate sanitation
World Water Day addresses the increasing need for adequate and safe water
WELL promotes environmental health and well-being through clean water
supplies
WEDC is concerned with the planning, provision and management of physical
infrastructure of water and engineering
IRC focuses on low-cost water supply and sanitation in developing countries
World Water Council promotes effective use of water in all its dimensions