Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Although a fifth of India is covered by forest (a livelihood source for 200 million people), almost half is patchy or degraded. Joint Forest Management (JFM) may be good for forests but is it good for people? Can India regenerate forests and meet the subsistence requirements of forest residents? How can tussles between foresters, industrialists, conservationists and social activists be resolved?
A booklet from the World Wide Fund for Nature – India and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) reviews the history of forestry policy in India and assesses the prospects for JFM to fulfil its potential. Arguing that sterile forest policy debates have stereotyped people by creating goodies and baddies, conservatives and pragmatists, it calls for greater understanding and tolerance of divergent interests.
JFM emerged out of recognition of the need to prioritise conservation and meet the timber and non-timber forest products (NTFP) needs of poor, predominantly tribal, forest residents. Since it was pronounced as state policy in 1988 it has had a chequered development. Although authorities and government foresters in some states are committed to JFM, their counterparts elsewhere see it as a donor-imposed cross which they have to bear.
In most states, village organisations have no autonomous status and can be dissolved by forestry officials who fight hard to retain authority. While in some parts of the country a slow attitudinal change away from centralisation towards participation can be observed, elsewhere forestry departments are attempting to increase authority via JFM rather than vice versa.
The booklet also notes that:
Lubricating stuck debates requires all stakeholders to search for flexible negotiated solutions and accountable ways of working together. Farm forestry is the key to JFM success. Among the recommendations are:
Source(s):
‘Joint forest management: policy, practice and prospects’, International
Institute for Environment and Development, by Arvind Khare, Madhu Sarin, N.C.
Saxena and S. Palit, 2000 Full document.
Funded by: DFID, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation
id21 Research Highlight: 14 November 2003
Further Information:
Forests and Wildlife Division
World Wide Fund for Nature – India
172-B Lodi Estate
Max Mueller Marg
Lodi Estate
New Delhi 110 003
India
Tel:
+91 (0) 11 2462 2972
Fax:
+91 (0) 11 2462 6837
Contact the contributor: fwl@wwfind.ernet.in
N.C. Saxena
68, Friends Colony West
New Delhi, 110065
India
Tel:
+91 11 469 0401 ext 1228
Fax:
+91 11 469 1410
Contact the contributor: nareshsaxena@hotmail.com
Forestry and Land Use Programme
International Institute for Environment and Development
3 Endsleigh Street
London WC1H ODD
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)7388 2117
Fax:
+44 (0)7388 2826
Contact the contributor: forestry@iied.org
International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)
Other related links:
'Privileging the partnership: can joint forest management succeed?'
'Rhetoric or reality? Joint management of natural resources in India'
'Are governments out of the woods? Returning Africa’s woodlands to
communities'
See further research from the Forest Policy and Environment Group
'Private sector involvement in China’s forests: sustainable forestry?'