Please note - this article was originally published on the id21 website which has now closed. This and other articles produced by id21 were archived by Eldis in 2009 and are not actively maintained. If you find links and references which are no longer valid please email eldis@ids.ac.uk.
Ensuring farmers have seed is an essential part of emergency aid strategies in Africa. But how effective are these strategies, and who benefits from them?
Research from the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture and Catholic Relief Services examines emergency seed systems in seven African countries. There are two types of seed relief systems. The first relies on seed distribution by commercial organisations (most common in countries where maize is the dominant cereal). The second is based on farmer systems where seed is sourced from market traders – either directly or via a voucher system.
Local seed markets are resilient and continue to function during periods of stress. Seeds from these markets are often acceptable to farmers, as they know where the seed was produced and are confident of its performance. Local seed markets are also increasingly important for introducing new seed varieties, developed by formal research systems, either directly through sale at special seed fairs or indirectly through market traders. In many cases, local systems are actually more effective at introducing new seed varieties than formal distribution channels.
It is crucial that policies and practices support local seed markets in post-stress periods. Seed vouchers and fairs are a new mechanism to distribute seed aid that provide beneficiaries with choice, and support local seed traders and markets. Beneficiaries receive vouchers that they can exchange for locally sold seeds.
The research shows:
There are some circumstances where local seed markets cannot cope. When crop production breaks down because of plant disease or declining fertility, local systems may not have the capacity to bring in new plant materials. For example, when cassava brown streak disease hit Mozambique, the distribution of disease-free cuttings did not work as quickly or widely as expected, nor was subsequent farmer management adequate. It is crucial to share knowledge about the causes of the disease and effective planting practices alongside the introduction of new materials.
In most cases, seed aid is triggered by an acute event, but there are often underlying problems. These include declining agricultural productivity, drought stress and ongoing civil unrest. By only responding in disaster situations, seed aid programmes often overlook the underlying causes of seed insecurity. Furthermore, a disaster response, whether direct distribution or market-based, often fails to examine the precise problem or how farmers are coping with it. This misses opportunities to strengthen seed systems and improve seed security.
Several policies can improve the effectiveness of seed aid. The researchers recommend a combination of strategies:
Source(s):
‘Addressing Seed Security in Disaster Response: Linking Relief with
Development,’ International Centre for Tropical Agriculture: Cali, Colombia,
by (eds) Louise Sperling, Tom Remington, Jon M. Haugen and Sigrid Nagoda, 2004 Full document.
Funded by: United States Agency for International Development and Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
id21 Research Highlight: 22 June 2006
Further Information:
Louise Sperling
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)
Le Ginestre
Lucio Volumnio 37
00178 Rome, Italy
Tel:
+39 (6) 7185454
Fax:
+39 (6) 6197661
Contact the contributor: l.sperling@cgiar.org
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical, Italy
Tom Remington
Catholic Relief Services
PO Box 49675
Nairobi
Kenya
Tel:
+254 733 627 660
Contact the contributor: tremington@crsearo.org
Catholic Relief Services, Kenya
Other related links:
'Putting farmers at the centre of the rice seed systems in Bangladesh'
'Maintaining crop genetic diversity through farmer networks'
'Using local seed systems for agricultural disaster recovery'