Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Levels of poverty and vulnerability in Malawi are very high. And many poor people are vulnerable to falling deeper into poverty. A key reason is inability to cope with increasing exposure to sudden and unexpected changes (shocks). What types of social protection measures could prevent people falling deeper into poverty?
Research from the Institute of Development Studies, UK, and the University of Malawi examines the nature of vulnerability to chronic poverty and malnutrition in Malawi. The research also analyses the effectiveness of the various social protection measures that have been introduced, and draws on lessons from experiences in other countries.
Most people in Malawi live in rural areas and depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. But agriculture is a source of poverty and vulnerability. Many farming families lack the productive assets (land, livestock and labour) and farming inputs (fertiliser and seeds) to help them cope with shocks such as the erratic rainfall which increases the risk of droughts and floods.
There are limited alternative sources of income in rural areas, yet few people move to the towns and cities to look for work. Rural families are therefore overly-reliant on farming for their livelihoods. Another problem is weak markets, especially in the more remote areas. This restricts access to farming inputs and exposes poor people to excessive food price fluctuations.
Many people are also affected by shocks such as accidents, illness or death of a family member. HIV/AIDS is having a devastating impact. Other factors contributing to increasing vulnerability in Malawi include: severe discrimination against women and girls, the breakdown of social support systems and rising crime and insecurity.
Key findings of the research include:
Social protection and livelihood promotion measures could help to reduce poverty and vulnerability in Malawi. But current interventions by government and non-government organisations are uncoordinated, patchy and poorly targeted.
The implications of the research include:
Source(s):
‘Vulnerability and Social Protection in Malawi’, IDS Discussion Paper 387,
IDS: Brighton, by Stephen Devereux, Bob Baulch, Ian Macauslan, Alexander Phiri
and Rachel Sabates-Wheeler, 2007 (PDF) Full document.
Funded by: UK Department for International Development
id21 Research Highlight: 9 October 2007
Further Information:
Stephen Devereux
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE, UK
Tel:
+44 (0)1273 678773
Fax:
+44 (0)1273 621202
Contact the contributor: s.devereux@ids.ac.uk
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Bob Baulch
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE, UK
Tel:
+44 (0)1273 678774
Fax:
+44 (0)1273 621202
Contact the contributor: r.j.baulch@ids.ac.uk
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Ian Macauslan
Tel:
Fax:
Contact the contributor: I.Macauslan@ids.ac.uk