Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Poverty reduction strategies often focus too much on controlling inflation, achieving price stability and setting tight fiscal targets. As a result, they pay too little attention to economic fluctuations arising from external shocks. New policies could help developing countries withstand drops in commodity prices, shocks from natural disasters and post-liberalisation instability.
Under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative, poor countries have been encouraged to prepare Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) as a condition for debt relief. This requires a development strategy to contribute to poverty alleviation and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. All PRSPs aim to promote rapid and sustainable economic growth, but stress that this has to be pro-poor.
A paper from the Institute of Development Studies (UK) analyses the content of 15 PRSPs from the perspective of growth and poverty reduction. It argues that most previous research on PRSPs has focused on the participatory process involved in their formulation, while neglecting their content, particularly core macroeconomic policies.
Most PRSPs have set ambitious growth and poverty reduction targets close to the peaks of the trends observed in the 1990s. However, donors are encouraging poorer countries to continue with the sorts of policies that may have been useful in the past to bring about macroeconomic stability and balance-of-payments equilibrium, but which nonetheless have failed to support growth and reduce poverty.
Examination of PRSPs shows that:
The vagueness of PRSPs on monetary policy is the result of developing countries’ lack of monetary instruments to control liquidity effectively as well as limited technical and monitoring capacity for the implementation of a carefully designed monetary policy. Almost all PRSP countries have got inflation under control but have not adapted their monetary policy to include growth and employment objectives.
The author recommends that PRSPs should:
Source(s):
‘The macro content of PRSPs: assessing the need for a more flexible
macroeconomic policy framework’, Development Policy Review, 23 (4), pages
419-442, by Ricardo Gottschalk, 2005
Funded by: North-South Institute
id21 Research Highlight: 22 December 2005
Further Information:
Ricardo Gottschalk
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)1273 678777
Fax:
+44 (0)1273 621202 / 691647
Contact the contributor: RicardoG@ids.ac.uk
Institute of Development Studies
Other related links:
'Poverty Reduction Strategies: getting it right second time around'
'The need to monitor poverty reduction strategies'
'Linking rural livelihoods to poverty reduction strategies in Africa'
'Putting water and sanitation at the heart of poverty reduction'
GRC-Exchange's Topic Guide on PRSPs
WHO's database on health in PRSPs