Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Are transport planners trying to understand the needs of rural people? How are women’s transport needs different from those of men? Do road projects ease women’s burdens? Are transport policy-makers obsessed with the promotion of motorised transport? Do they know how to assess demand?
A paper from South Africa’s Council for Scientific Industrial Research and the University of the North asks globally applicable questions as it looks critically at a road-upgrading project in an isolated area of South Africa’s Limpopo Province. Lessons from the failure of a well-meaning, but flawed, project are used to draw out gender issues in accessibility and mobility.
The Tshitwe road-upgrading project was intended to provide year-round accessibility, reduce the cost of freight and passenger services and assist agriculture by reducing the costs of inputs, boosting access to extension services and increasing farm-gate prices. The project also sought to increase community ownership and the participation of women. In practice, it provided employment to 47 local women and 67 men from one of the poorest areas in South Africa.
Although the 15 km stretch of road has been built, the project only partially achieved its objectives:
Conventional transport policies treat communities as uniform and fail to see that women and men have different mobility and accessibility needs. Methods that equate the current travel patterns of a community with its members’ needs and use this to determine the demand ignore those whose voices are not heard.
Radical interventions are required if disadvantaged people in the vast rural areas of South Africa’s former homelands are to be integrated into the national economy. Reducing the transport burden which, isolates already marginalised women should be set as an indicator of the success of interventions aimed at improving the quality of rural life.
Policy-makers are urged to revisit the traditional definition of transport and to:
Source(s):
‘Social exclusion and rural transport: a road improvement project’, in
Balancing the load: women, gender and transport, Priyanthi Fernando and Gina
Porter (eds.), Zed Books, by Mac Mashiri and Sabina Mahapa, 2002 Full document.
id21 Research Highlight: 3 April 2003
Further Information:
Mac Mashiri
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR): Transportek
PO Box 395
Pretoria 0001
South Africa
Tel:
+27 (0)12 841 2942
Fax:
+27 (0)12 841-4054
Contact the contributor: mmashiri@csir.co.za
Sabina Mahapa
Mamly’s Interior Décor
Shop 11, Kirkade
Hans van Rensburg Street
Polokwane
South Africa
Tel:
+27 (0)15 291 1774
Contact the contributor: sabina@mamlys.co.za
Zed Books
7 Cynthia Street
London N1 9JF
UK
Tel:
+44 (0) 20 7837-4014
Fax:
+44 (0) 20 7833-3960
Contact the contributor: sales@zedbooks.demon.co.uk
Other related links:
'Far-fetched? Does travelling for treatment increase TB mortality risks?'
Insights #41 'Mind the gap! Bridging the rural-urban divide'
See the International Forum for Rural Transport and Development for
further information
UNESCAP reports on Road Transport Pricing
The World Bank focuses on Transport