Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
Investment incentives such as tax exemptions for small and medium-sized enterprises were reintroduced in Ethiopia in the 1990s. The government has promoted the initiative as a success story. However, other factors may be equally, if not more, important for local entrepreneurs seeking to set up enterprises.
Many developing countries have used investment incentives to assist foreign and domestic enterprises. It is thought that incentives such as tax exemptions for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) could ensure local ownership and both create and foster better regional distribution of employment, income, development and industrialisation.
In Ethiopia, the Investment Incentives Scheme (IIS) was reintroduced in the 1990s to assist local industries and influence their location. This scheme consisted in exempting certain industries from paying taxes on some imported goods and also from paying income tax for a set period, if they were to set up in locations approved by the government. An article from the Open University, UK examines the extent to which the IIS influenced entrepreneurial decisions over the choice of industry and location.
Between 1992 and 1998, 4246 indigenous industries were licensed, of which 1163 (27 percent) started up. The government, noting the increased start-up rate and their locations outside the capital Addis Ababa, has claimed success.
Key findings include:
The IIS had significant economic costs for the government in terms of tax revenue lost and the costs of setting up and running IIS offices across the country. Further, less than 36 percent of the licensed start-ups benefited from income tax exemptions because they did not make profits during the exemption period.
The author concludes that there is no direct relation between the IIS programme and the increase in SME set-ups and that the benefits from the programme are too small to override other factors. Further, potentially more effective initiatives could have been implemented with the tax revenues lost through exemptions. The author advises caution in implementing similar programmes where entrepreneurs’ resources and the social and physical infrastructure are limited.
Key recommendations include:
Source(s):
‘The Industry and Location Impacts of Investment Incentives on SMEs
Start-up in Ethiopia’, Journal of International Development, Vol.18 (1), pages
1-13, by Seife Ayele, 2006 Full document.
id21 Research Highlight: 17 February 2006
Further Information:
Seife Ayele
Development Policy and Practice
Faculty of Technology
The Open University
Walton Hall
Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
United Kingdom
Tel:
+ 44 (0)1908 655534
Fax:
+ 44 (0)1908 654825
Contact the contributor: s.ayele@open.ac.uk
Other related links:
'Business development support to small service providers'
'Vocational educational and training institutes in Nigeria: unable to meet
the needs of employers?'
'Promoting infomediaries – how modern technology can package business
information for microenterprises '
Integrated Programme: Ethiopia (UNIDO)
Investment Guide, Ethiopian Business Development Services Network (EBDSN)