Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
There are substantial differences in living standards among Viet Nam’s 54 officially recognised ethnic groups. Most lowland Vietnamese Kinh, who make up 84 percent of the population, have benefited greatly from economic reforms initiated since the late 1980s. However, most ethnic minority groups have gained less and are being left behind.
The government in Ho Chi Minh famously declared the need to ensure the unity and equality of all the peoples of Viet Nam. However, research from the Institute of Development Studies, in the UK, and the Centre for Analysis and Forecasting, in Viet Nam, shows that measures of living standards (such as poverty, expenditures, life expectancy, school enrolment, and nutritional status) remain low among Viet Nam’s ethnic minorities. This is despite the many policies introduced to assist them.
The Kinh majority have traditionally inhabited fertile lowland and coastal areas in and around the Red River and Mekong River deltas, while the Hoa (ethnic Chinese) live in urban areas (especially Ho Chi Minh City). With the exception of the Khmer (who are concentrated in the Mekong Delta) and the Chăm (located along the southern coast), most other ethnic groups live across Viet Nam’s upland and highland areas.
It is here that deprivation is greatest. Despite comprising just over one-eighth of the national population, the ethnic minorities account for about two-fifths of poor people. Between 1993 and 2004, the percentage of Viet Nam’s population living in poverty fell from 58.1 to 19.5 percent, but among ethnic minorities, this measure only declined from 86.4 to 60.7 percent. Ethnic minorities tend to be less educated, lack sufficient land of good quality, have limited access to skilled jobs and often lack competence in the national language.
Research shows that:
The Government of Viet Nam has adopted numerous measures to improve the situation in remote communes through investments in infrastructure such as roads, schools and markets, along with subsidies to make commodities and transportation more affordable. However, research has found that these measures alone cannot promote greater equality among Viet Nam’s ethnic groups.
Key recommendations include:
Source(s):
‘The Economic Development of Ethnic Minorities in Vietnam’, Policy Brief,
Institute of Development Studies/Centre for Analysis and Forecasting, IDS:
Brighton, 2008 (PDF) Full document.
‘Ethnic Minority Development in Vietnam’, Journal of Development Studies
43 (7), pages 1151-1176, by Bob Baulch, Truong Thi Kim Chuyen, Dominique
Haughton and Jonathan Haughton, 2007
‘Ethnicity and Household Welfare in Vietnam: Empirical Evidence from 1993
to 2004’, Revised Draft, Institute of Development Studies, IDS: Brighton, by
Bob Baulch, Hung T Pham and Barry Reilly, 2007 (PDF) Full document.
Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council (UK) and the UK Department for International Development
id21 Research Highlight: 27 April 2008
Further Information:
Bob Baulch
Ethnic Minority Development in Vietnam Project
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE
UK
Tel:
+44 1273 678774
Fax:
+44 1273 621202
Contact the contributor: b.baulch@ids.ac.uk
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Other related links:
'Migration in Vietnam: driven by the state or the market?'
'User-friendly healthcare? Public health services in Vietnam after
economic reform'
'Dovetailing agricultural extension and poverty alleviation: opportunities
in Vietnam'