Eldis

Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

Debt from microfinance traps Bolivia’s poorest

Microfinance debt is increasing the vulnerability of the poorest in Bolivia, according to an impact assessment of the industry. Microfinance organisations (MFOs) are improving income, investment and employment - but only for their wealthier clients.

In 1999, Bolivia was hit by severe economic crisis. A stable financial period of five years came to an end. Political upheaval and economic recession followed. This created a great deal of anger among the working classes. And as tension between creditors and debtors mounted, the country’s microfinance industry began to face increasing hostility.

Reliable data on the effectiveness of microfinance in Bolivia was urgently needed. So an impact assessment was launched by the Association of Financial Institutions for Rural Development (FINRURAL) - a not-for-profit Bolivian non-governmental organisation (NGO) with 15 microfinance organizations under its umbrella. This aimed to go further than most impact assessments, which measure only institutional development. It aimed to measure the social and economic impacts of microfinance upon the performance of all clients, and upon the lives of all affected (at the level of individual, household, and community). The first round of assessments was carried out in 2002, involving eight MFOs. A second round began in 2004.

Researchers from FINRURAL and the UK's University of Sheffield now summarise the results of the 2004 assessments, revealing that:

Unfortunately, the results indicate that many of Bolivia’s very poor people risk falling deeper into the poverty cycle by taking microfinance credit, especially during the recession. The authors suggest that the industry must adapt to address this problem, by:

FINRURAL’s approach to impact assessment may be new. But do the benefits outweigh the costs? Total costs from 2001 to 2004 are estimated at US $153,000, or US $19,135 per institution assessed. These are predicted to fall to just US $12,200 per institution during the second round of assessments. Benefits amongst MFOs include: mediation between themselves and their market, exposure of service deficiencies, and useful data for publicity material and sponsor appeals. Benefits for FINRURAL staff include broader organisational links, increased professional competency in quantitative research, and new contacts within academia, government and NGOs. And the assessments are believed to have strengthened the microfinance industry as a whole against recession.

The authors conclude the FINRURAL impact assessments to have been cost effective. The number of institutions willing to pay for them rose from eight to ten between assessment rounds, despite an increase in charges.

Source(s):
‘The FINRURAL Impact Evaluation Service: a Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation’, Small Enterprise Development, 15:3, by Reynaldo Marconi and Paul Mosley, September 2004

Funded by: FINRURAL and the University of Sheffield

id21 Research Highlight: 3 March 2006

Further Information:
Paul Mosley
Department of Economics
9 Mappin Street
Sheffield S1 4DT
UK

Tel: +44 (0)114 2223397
Contact the contributor: p.mosley@shef.ac.uk

Reynaldo Marconi
FINRURAL
Av. Arce 2081 Esq. Montevideo
Edif. Montevideo, Piso 3
La Paz, Bolivia

Tel: (591-2) 2441326 2121005
Fax: (591-2) 2443504
Contact the contributor: gerencia@finrural-bo.org

Other related links:
'Realising the potential of microfinance' id21 insights #51

'Unveiling the unrecorded: understanding the complex financial lives of India’s poor'

'Credit crisis: does microfinance benefit the very poor?'

'Escaping poverty: Can policy reach the chronically poor?' id21 insights #46

See id21's links page on microfinance

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.