Eldis

Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

Collective action promotes economic development in Kerala

Public participation in social and political decision-making is considered to be an essential condition for successful economic development. Through collective action and participation, people (particularly poor people) get a valuable opportunity to voice their needs and demands. But what type and what level of collective action will help rather than harm economic development?

Research from the Institute of Development Studies, UK, analyses the impact of collective action and public participation on economic development. It looks at data from the South Indian state of Kerala between 1973 and 1999. It compares two types of collective action: industrial strikes and politically motivated riots. The research asks whether and how collective actions affect the development of poor economies, taking account of immediate and longer-term impacts as well as direct and indirect effects.

Collective action is both influenced by, and influences, the type of development strategy followed by a given society. Kerala’s unique development strategy has resulted in the coexistence of poor economic performance with high living standards and reduced poverty. The positive social developments are usually accredited to the actions of collective movements which have advocated public demands. But collective movements are also held responsible for unsustainable levels of public spending and social and economic instability (which discourages investment).

Kerala has a high number of trade unions, and a relatively high level of strikes and politically motivated riots compared with other Indian states. Strikes have decreased in Kerala since the late 1970s whereas the level of rioting has remained fairly constant.

Key findings on the impact of these forms of collective action on economic development include:

Excessive activism can harm economic performance. But some forms of collective action have an important role to play in the promotion of economic growth. This effect may be strongest where political activism results in pro-poor redistributive policies (which have been shown to stimulate economic growth).

The researcher concludes that:

Source(s):
‘The Impact of Collective Action on Economic Development: Empirical Evidence from Kerala, India’, World Development 34 (7), pages 1254-1270, by Patricia Justino, 2006

Funded by: British Academy

id21 Research Highlight: 24 January 2007

Further Information:
Patricia Justino
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE
UK

Tel: + 44 (0)1273 877231
Fax: + 44 (0)1273 621202
Contact the contributor: P.justino@ids.ac.uk

Institute of Development Studies

Other related links:
'Community forestry in Nepal – are poor people winners or losers?'

'Jamaican Social Investment Fund: elite-driven, but pleasing the majority'

'Illegal logging and forest livelihoods: which way forward for greater justice?'

Eldis Participation Resource Guide

Economic development in Africa: from adjustment to poverty reduction: what is new?

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.