Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.
The Community-Led Infrastructure Finance Facility is pioneering a new approach to providing long-term loan finance for community-driven infrastructure initiatives. This financial mechanism gives urban poor people’s organisations direct access to money to develop sustainable solutions for slums. Launched in India, this approach could be replicated globally.
A report from Homeless International, UK, describes the Community-Led Infrastructure Finance Facility (CLIFF) approach and assesses the feasibility of applying it in sub-Saharan Africa. CLIFF is based on two basic convictions: that urban poor people bear an unfair share of the risks in slum upgrading and the commercial banking sector would lend to urban poor people’s organisations if they knew how to.
Urban poor people have developed innovative approaches to slum upgrading, resettlement and infrastructure provision. However, they have often had to be developed in defiance of local planning and building regulations that rarely work for them. Across India, community mobilisation has led to the emergence of organisations proactively developing relationships with city authorities. However, most of the investments they make go unrecognised by the formal institutions with which they deal.
This lack of recognition matters. Banks feel unable to lend money to projects that do not fit with common expectations, run by groups without conventional collateral. Banks’ risk assessment systems and mechanisms for extending credit are not designed to reflect the complexities of community-led processes. Lending for slum upgrading does not fit into their core business models. When there is unmet demand for their products from wealthier clients, why should they lend to poor people?
The CLIFF approach to getting banks and communities to do business is built around several forms of financial assistance to organisations with the basic capacity to upgrade slums. These include:
Replicating CLIFF in Africa will be complicated by the lack of adequate data on urban poverty, uncoordinated slum upgrading strategies and a tendency to impose technical solutions from other places. Building a federation of organisations committed to partnerships and shared learning will require community-managed savings and loan systems with links to other communities. It also requires:
Source(s):
‘Feasibility studies for the application of Community-Led Infrastructure
Finance Facility operations in Sub-Saharan African countries: Summary Report’,
Homeless International, by Ruth McLeod, September 2004 (PDF) Full document.
Country studies can be downloaded from Full document.
Funded by: Urban Management Programme; UN Habitat
id21 Research Highlight: 19 September 2006
Further Information:
Ruth McLeod
Homeless International
Queens House
16 Queens Road
Coventry, CV1 3DF
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)24 76632802
Fax:
+44 (0)24 76632911
Contact the contributor: ruth@homeless-international.org
Other related links:
"Financing housing for the urban poor: opportunities for civil
society-state-private sector collaboration"
"'Research on Bridging the Finance gap in Housing and Infrastructure and
the Development of CLIFF", CLIFF Background paper, by R. McLeod, Homeless
International, 2002
'Bridging the Finance Gap in Housing and Infrastructure – SPARC, India – a
Case Study', by R. McLeod, Homeless International, 2000'
'Humpty Dumpty, Poverty and Urban Governance – An Exploration of
Investment Partnerships with the Poor', paper prepared for the 2nd Regional
Meeting of the UNCHS Urban Management Programme, by R. McLeod, September 2001