Eldis

Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

Protecting the internet as a global public good

The World Summit on the Information Society, held in Geneva in December 2003 and in Tunis in November 2005, put the issue of internet governance and regulation of the information highway on diplomatic agendas. However, confusion remains as to what internet governance actually means.

A booklet published by the DiploFoundation and the Global Knowledge Partnership provides a broad overview of 40 governance issues, describing the current situation and surveying the associated unresolved questions. The authors set out an Internet Governance Toolkit, a practical framework for the analysis, discussion and resolution of the key problems in this field.

Internet governance is not a simple subject. The subject’s many subtleties and shades of meaning and perception cover a continuum of options and compromises.

Reaching consensus on what is meant by Internet governance is complicated by the range of competing professional perspectives:

In an attempt to defuse controversy, the UN Working Group on Internet Governance was set up in November 2004 to develop a working definition of the subject. Misunderstanding during the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) process primarily came from the use of the term ‘governance’ as a synonym for ‘government’. When the term ‘Internet governance’ was introduced in the WSIS process, many countries, especially developing countries, linked it to the concept of government. One consequence was the belief that Internet governance issues should be addressed at the inter-governmental level, with only limited participation of non-state organisations.

Many people frequently refer to the principle of universal Internet access, but without necessary political and financial support this is vague and of little practical relevance. Whether universal access is globally achievable will depend on the willingness of developed countries to invest in this.

The priorities of the emerging Internet governance regime should include:

Source(s):
‘Internet governance - issues, actors and divides’, GKP Issues Paper, Knowledge for Development Series, by Eduardo Gelbstein and Jovan Kurbalija, 2005 Full document.

id21 Research Highlight: 21 September 2006

Further Information:
Eduardo Gelbstein and Jovan Kurbalija
DiploFoundation
Rue de Lausanne 56
CH-1202 Genève 21
Switzerland

Tel: +41 22 741 0420
Fax: + 41 22 731 1663
Contact the contributor: jovank@diplomacy.edu; gelbstein@diplomacy.edu

DiploFoundation

Global Knowledge Partnership Secretariat
Level 23, Tower 2, MNI Twins
11, Jalan Pinang
50450 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Tel: +603 2162 3000
Fax: +603 2162 2823
Contact the contributor: gkps@gkps.org.my

Global Knowledge Partnership Secretariat

World Summit on the Information Society

World Summit on the Information Society

Other related links:
"World Summit on the Information Society - what did it achieve for ICTs and Development? What did it ignore?"

"Voices from Asia-Pacific: internet governance priorities and recommendations" ELDIS

"ICT4D: connecting people for a better world" ELDIS

"WSIS website"

"UNESCO and WSIS"

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.