Eldis

Please note - this is a temporary window. id21 is joining forces with Eldis and therefore the id21 website has been suspended. Soon all id21 content will be available on the Eldis website.

New approaches to water sector governance

Money is not the only obstacle to achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of halving the number of people without safe water. There is a relationship between poor governance and a country’s lack of water services. Unless they address governance issues, many countries will not achieve the water MDG, even with more funding.

A paper from the Overseas Development Institute, in the UK, offers guidance to the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) on how to improve its approach to governance in water services.

Key mistakes and challenges for the countries that are not on track to meet the water MDG are:

Drawing on DFID thinking, terminology and approaches, the authors argue that the development of water services needs to be more closely aligned with governance in other sectors. It proposes ways to adapt and apply DFID’s ‘Capability, Accountability and Responsiveness’ (CAR) framework to water programme design. The CAR framework assesses and monitors the various dimensions of governance that lead to state capability, accountability and responsiveness and provides a basis for identifying what governance improvements are needed.

When used with a Sector Governance Assessment methodology in the water sector, the CAR framework can identify the attributes sought, present strengths and weaknesses, and suggest indicators that can be developed to measure progress.

It is also important for programme planners to identify and understand ‘drivers of change’ (DOCs) and identify where power lies. The DOC approach highlights the importance of understanding the underlying political systems and the mechanisms of pro-poor change. It focuses attention on formal and informal rules, power structures, vested interests and incentives.

In recent years DOCs have been assessed in over 20 countries DFID focuses on. Identifying drivers of change permits international donor agencies like DFID to join local actors to put pressure on elites to introduce pro-poor services and improve accountability.

DOC and power analysis can be challenging to staff of agencies like DFID because it reveals how little they really know about how to promote progressive and sustainable change, and often highlights the limits of donor intervention.

The authors advise DFID to:

Source(s):
‘Rethinking governance in water services’, Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper 284, by Janelle Plummer and Tom Slaymaker, ODI Working Paper 284, October 2007 (PDF) Full document.

Funded by: UK Department for International Development (DFID)

id21 Research Highlight: 14 December 2008

Further Information:
Tom Slaymaker
Water Policy Programme
Overseas Development Institute
111 Westminster Bridge Road
London, SE7 1JD
UK

Tel: +44 20 79220300
Fax: +44 20 79220399
Contact the contributor: t.slaymaker@odi.org.uk

Water Policy Programme, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK

Other related links:
'A new era for water governance in Kenya?'

'Playing with privatisation – experiences in Kenya’s water sector'

'Regulation partnerships for African water utilities'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DfID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Articles featured on the id21 site may be copied or quoted without restriction provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2009 IDS. All rights reserved.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development. id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of www.mediachannel.org. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.