Determinants of deposit-insurance adoption and design
Determinants of deposit-insurance adoption and design
Causes of poor design of national financial safety nets
This report seeks to identify factors that influence decisions about a country's financial safety net using a new dataset on 170 countries covering the 1960-2003 period.
The analysis finds that pressure to emulate developed-country regulatory frameworks and power-sharing political institutions dispose a country toward adopting design features that inadequately control risk-shifting.
Overall, the policy lesson is not that deposit insurance is to be avoided but that:
- democratic systems, which allow sectoral interests to negotiate more openly with one another, prove more likely to adopt deposit insurance and (at least initially) to design it poorly
- systems installed in crisis circumstances and in response to external pressures to emulate other countries are especially apt to be poorly designed
