Search

Reset

Searching with a thematic focus on Governance Assessments, Governance, Regional initiatives of assessing governance, Sub-Saharan Africa, APRM

Showing 11-19 of 19 results

Pages

  • Document

    The APRM process in Burkina Faso

    Open Society Institute and Soros Foundations Network, 2009
    This report is an evaluation of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process in Burkina Faso. It examines whether and to what extent the self-assessment complied with the effectiveness and credibility criteria defined by the APRM documents. It looks at the extent to which the process was open, participatory, transparent and independent.
  • Document

    Benin and the African Peer Review Mechanism: consolidating democratic achievements

    Open Society Institute and Soros Foundations Network, 2008
    This report offers an independent review of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process of governance in Benin. It presents the most important stages in the process from the time Benin signed the APRM MoU until the presentation of the report. It reviews problems faced and the strong points of the process.
  • Document

    The African Peer Review Mechanism: assessing origins, institutional relations and achievements

    South African Institute of International Affairs, 2009
    This paper analyses the impact of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). It examines the APRM’s relationship with the African Union (AU), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (Nepad) and other governance initiatives beyond the continent.
  • Document

    The African Peer Review Mechanism APRM: Africa’s innovative thinking on governance

    UNDP Oslo Governance Centre, 2007
    African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) reflects a fundamental shift in Pan African thought in its attempt to formalise an early warning mechanism to avert political and economic crises in Africa. It advances the acceptance of the African Union and of the tentative and limited modification of the notion of sovereignty in Africa.
  • Document

    The Ghana APRM process: a case study

    UNDP Oslo Governance Centre, 2007
    This paper examines the context within which the Ghana APRM process was conducted, the nature of the assessment, the assessment process, and how the outcome of the assessment process was used.
  • Document

    Governance and state delivery in Southern Africa

    Nordic Africa Institute / Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala, 2007
    This document is composed of three papers: the contributions on Namibia and Botswana look at the extent to which these countries are able to set standards in terms of well functioning democracies; the paper on Zimbabwe argues that the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) should be enforced as a way out of the current impasse.
  • Document

    The APRM A case study in democratic institution building?

    Institute for Security Studies, 2007
    The New Economic Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) and the Africa Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) arose out of the need to attend to the sluggish democratic transitions in Africa as well as the stagnation of African development in general.
  • Document

    The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) in the Context of Responsiveness and Accountability

    UNDP Oslo Governance Centre, 2009
    The paper discusses the Peer Review Mechanism (PRM) which is the principal means by which African governments can be held accountable for their poverty reduction initiatives as well as their actions generally.
  • Document

    Effective  stakeholder  participation  in  the  APRM  Process  for  the  promotion   of democratic  governance: a case study of Ghana

    UNDP Oslo Governance Centre, 2006
    The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) is ‘an instrument voluntarily acceded to by Member States of the African Union as an African self-monitoring mechanism’. Its primary purpose is to foster the adoption of policies, standards and practices that lead to the attainment of the objectives of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD).

Pages