Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Trade Policy, Agriculture trade policy, Trade Liberalisation, Liberalisation Impacts
Showing 11-20 of 38 results
Pages
- Document
Non-reciprocal preference erosion arising from MFN liberalization in agriculture: what are the risks?
World Trade Organization, 2006This paper estimates the risk of preference erosion for non-reciprocal preference recipients in the agricultural sector as a consequence of most-favoured nation (MFN) tariff cuts.DocumentHow freer trade can help feed the poor: an agenda for easing hunger worldwide by reducing trade protectionism
International Monetary Fund, 2005This article for Finance and Development examines how trade policy can be harnessed to help reduce poverty and alleviate hunger and outlines an agenda to reduce food insecurity in developing countries.When considering food security, it argues, the Doha trade liberalisation talks need to shift the focus from how the trading system can be used to increase the degree of self-sufficiency to how itDocumentNo soft landing: as China opens its markets, US subsidies are making life hard for cotton farmers
Oxfam, 2005This paper examines the dynamics of the world cotton market and highlights imbalances which have been detrimental for Chinese cotton farmers.DocumentAgricultural liberalization in multilateral and regional trade negotiations
Institute for the Integration for Latin America and the Carribean, 2005For most Western Hemispheric (WH) countries, agriculture is a sensitive sector, absorbing a considerable portion of the economically active population and representing a high percentage of GDP and exports. Thus, agriculture is a strategic issue for all Latin American countries for both regional and multilateral trade negotiations.DocumentMaking agricultural trade reform work for the poor
International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, USA, 2005This paper brings together what is known about the link between agricultural trade reform and poverty alleviation, and examines how developing countries can successfully manage to open their economies while reducing poverty. It highlights the channels that link agricultural growth, rural development and poverty alleviation with trade.DocumentDumping on the poor: the Common Agricultural Policy, the WTO and International Development
Catholic Fund for Overseas Development, 2005This paper critiques the EU's Common Agricultural Policy as a mechanism that promotes over-production and dumping of cheap goods that undercut local markets in developing countries. At the same time tariffs and other obstacles prevent agricultural producers in these countries from accessing the European markets for their own goods.DocumentTen Years of the WTO: subordinating development to free trade
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung e.V., 2005This paper critically looks back at 10 years of the World Trade Organisation. It argues that the WTO’s impact on the world’s poor has been overwhelmingly negative.DocumentForthcoming changes in the EU banana and sugar markets: a menu ofoptions for an effective EU transitional package
Overseas Development Institute, 2005Preferential access under the EU’s Sugar and Banana Protocols has supported large income transfers to a number of ACP countries. These transfers will be reduced under proposed reforms to the EU’s sugar and banana markets which are due to take place at the end of 2005.DocumentAgricultural trade reform and the Doha development agenda
World Bank, 2005This working paper examines the extent to which various regions, and the world as a whole, could gain from multilateral trade reform over the next decade.DocumentUnderstanding the issues: what's the matter with trade?
Norwegian Church Aid, 2005This is a set of papers that address the questions: do equal rules really allow poor producers to receive a fair share of the trade wealth and does the current free trade system represent equal rules at all?Pages
