Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Intellectual Property Rights, Trade Policy
Showing 101-110 of 420 results
Pages
- Document
The concept of essential medicines: lessons for rich countries
British Medical Journal, 2004This British Medical Journal article explores how industrialised countries could benefit from using the essential medicines list, currently used by developing countries. The article outlines how the response of most industrialised countries to increasing costs of medicines and demands for quality health care by ageing populations is fragmented.DocumentStrategic intellectual property rights policy and north-south technology transfer
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 2005This paper joins the debate on whether weak or strong protection for intellectual property in developing countries better promotes development. It gives an analysis of the welfare implications of protecting intellectual property rights (IPRs) within the framework of the WTO TRIPS agreement.DocumentWhat is biopiracy?
Institute of Education, University of London, 2004This paper seeks to shed some light on the meaning of the term “biopiracy” and to consider what should be done about it, bearing in mind that agreement on what is and isn’t biopiracy, and how much of it there actually is, is lacking. The fact that patent claims in various countries may incorporate biological and genetic material within their scope combined with the belief - held by many developDocumentFree trade agreement between the USA and Thailand threatens access to HIV/AIDS treatment
Oxfam, 2004This Oxfam briefing note outlines how the future of Thailand’s HIV/AIDS treatment programmes could be threatened by new intellectual property (IP) standards in a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the United States. The article outlines how the Thai treatment programmes lack important medicines to scale up. These patented medicines are too expensive for wide scale distribution.DocumentIntellectual property protection and biotechnology: issues and processes for African consensus
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2004This paper addresses the impact of IPR on biotechnology development and utilisation in Africa.DocumentSlow motion robbery: how the WTO is shrinking options for developing states
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Developing countries are being shackled by regulations formulated and enforced by international organisations. Policies to nurture domestic industry, which were used in Europe, north America and more recently the successful East Asian ‘tiger’ economies, are becoming illegal.DocumentSupporting local knowledge and protecting resources
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Community agricultural knowledge is considerable and is often overlooked by policy-makers. Better understanding and documentation is needed of how local knowledge affects community decision-making in the management of natural resources.DocumentAccessing agricultural information online: filling in the gaps
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Websites providing development-oriented information services for the agricultural sector are multiplying. This information growth, enabled by donor funding has not necessarily made it easier for users in developing countries to find and access relevant information. Many gaps and inconsistencies exist and much of the information available is not responsive to the demands of service users.DocumentBiotechnology politics in Delhi’s corridors of power
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Liberalisation in India relaxed several restrictions on the activities of foreign firms that operate locally. Consequently, an increasing number of multinational agricultural biotechnology companies set up operations in India. New Delhi’s biotechnology policy is now influenced by a small number of major foreign firms and local entrepreneurs with national and global connections.DocumentTerminator technology: the economic benefits of sterile seeds
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Terminator technology – the emerging technology for inducing sterility in seeds – is potentially detrimental to both biodiversity and the livelihoods of poor farmers forced to buy fresh seed every year. Repeat seed purchase, however, provides greater scope for companies to capture returns on their research investments in plant breeding.Pages
