Search
Searching in Mozambique, Tanzania
Showing 121-130 of 185 results
Pages
- Document
So this is democracy?: 2004 report on the state of media freedom in Southern Africa
Media Institute for Southern Africa, 2004This report gives an overview of the state of the media in Southern African countries, namely Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.DocumentTracking resource and policy impact: incorporating millennium development goals and indicators and poverty reduction strategy paper monitoring across sectors
Statistics Norway, 2004The main aim of this report is to show how a statistical system for tracking resource and policy impact could be designed and implemented.DocumentSugar industries in least developed countries: profiting from ‘Everything but Arms’
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2004Guaranteed high prices are increasing sugar production in many of the world’s least developed countries. The possibility of duty and quota free access to European markets in 2009 is attracting foreign investment. Proactive governments are now needed to maximise the opportunities that the ‘Everything but Arms’ (EBA) initiative brings.DocumentCan leprosy be eliminated by a single global campaign?
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2004In 1991 the World Health Assembly set a target to eliminate leprosy by the year 2000. The disease, which still caries a stigma, damages the skin and nerve endings and leads to ulcers and disability. A major World Health Organisation campaign has provided antibiotics to treat the disease in a number of countries. However a number of new cases have appeared in previously low priority countries.DocumentMaking waves: unique challenges for Marine Protected Areas
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2004Protecting marine and coastal areas involves many similar issues to terrestrial protected areas, including balancing conservation and development needs and managing tradeoffs between multiple users. However, they also present unique challenges: they often cross international boundaries and the high mobility or migration of many marine species makes protection beyond boundaries difficult.DocumentThe Global Fund: managing great expectations
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2005The Global Fund was set up in 2002 to provide funds for the fight against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. How successful has it been so far at attracting, managing and distributing additional resources?DocumentFilling the gaps: introducing substitute health workers in Africa
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2005Massive shortages in trained health care professionals in sub-Saharan Africa have led to an examination of substitute health workers as an immediate response to the workforce crisis.For many countries these substitute health workers (SHWs) are not new. They already play various minor roles in health services, especially in rural and deprived areas.DocumentTackling illegal fishing practices in Africa’s protected waters
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2005Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing is increasingly affecting the fisheries revenues of developing countries. The global cost of IUU fishing practices is estimated to be in excess of US$ 2.4 billion annually, about US$900 million for sub-Saharan Africa alone.DocumentForeign direct investment by African countries
Overseas Development Institute, 2005Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from developing countries has risen sharply over the past two decades. Most FDI has been by Asian firms establishing footholds in other Asian countries but there has also been investment in developed countries such as the European Union. However, with the exception of South African investment, there is little FDI stemming from Sub-Saharan Africa.DocumentTrade preference erosion: expanded assessment of countries at risk of welfare losses
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005This paper assesses the situation of the preference-reliant countries seen as being most at risk of experiencing negative welfare effects from preference erosion as a consequence of multilateral tariff liberalisation, with a focus on Bangladesh, Madagascar, Morocco, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.The paper finds that, while most developing regions experienced welfare gains as a consequPages
