Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Biotechnology and GMOs, Agriculture and food, Technology and innovation in agriculture
Showing 151-160 of 232 results
Pages
- Document
Globalisation and the international governance of modern biotechnology: the implications for food security in Kenya
International Environmental Law Research Centre, 2003This paper argues that for modern biotechnology research to have long term and wider positive social impact in Kenya, changes in policies and institutions must be implemented to ensure that it benefits the smallholder farmers who make up the majority of Kenya’s population.Critical issues examined include:biosafety food safetyloss of biodiversity IPRsThe report makesDocumentTrade in genetically modified food: a survey of empirical studies
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2002This paper analyses the current and potential economic impact of GM commodities on world trade.It concludes that: in general, adopters of the more productive GM technologies gain, while non-adopters or GM-critical regions either do not gain at all or only gain some (through changes in world prices), depending on how strongly they segment their markets.DocumentISF view on intellectual property
International Seed Federation, 2002This position paper from the International Seed Federation, an industry body, sets out the position of its members on IP protection for plant breeders and other related issues. ISF members are, not surprisingly, unanimously in favour of a strong IP protection.The federation considers that both ‘sui generis’ and patent style systems are legitimate.DocumentIPRs, biotechnology and food security
Gapresearch.org, IDS, 2002This paper examines the development and enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) at the international and national level and the impacts of IPRs on biotechnology, agricultural practices and food security concerns in the context of globalisation.DocumentPublic participation and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
United Nations [UN] Environment Programme, 2003This report summarises a study of the ways in which different countries have sought to promote and facilitate public awareness and participation in the design and implementation of their national biosafety frameworks (NBFs).DocumentTerminator five years later
Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration formerly RAFI, 2003This edition of "Communique" looks at the current policy situation with relation to the development and use of 'Terminator' technology in GM seed varieties.DocumentBiotechnology and the issues interconnected with and through it
Biowatch South Africa, 2002This paper takes a step back from the policy issues surrounding biotechnology and its role in development to present a broad discussion of the biotechnology sector and its implications.The paper argues that if biotechnology is to develop usefully, the risks involved with it should be prevented.DocumentBiotechnology and biodiversity: key policy issues for South Africa
Biowatch South Africa, 2000This paper from Biowatch describes some of the potential effects of genetic modification on biodiversity and the environment, within both the global and South African context. Background information about the nature and extent of the biotechnology industry is presently followed by a description of the potential risks and effects of biotechnology on biodiversity.DocumentPolicy, national regulation, and international standards for GM foods
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2003The adoption of biotechnology and the introduction of GM foods into the international marketplace has exacerbated an already difficult area of trade policy. As biotechnology increases productive capacity in various products, it also increases the need to trade. But diverging national regulations are increasingly impeding trade in these products creating market distortions.DocumentBenefits and shortcomings of intellectual property rights for small scale farmers in developing countries
Agricultural Information and Documentation Service for Development Cooperation, 2002Rafael Mariano from the Peasant Movement of the Philippines presents his case arguing that intellectual property rights, and more broadly science, have been co-opted by business interests (supported by the US) to strengthen their control over agricultural production and to open up new markets at the expense of small farmers and developing countries.In particular he argues: The 1991 ActPages
