Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture and food, Biotechnology and GMOs
Showing 161-170 of 293 results
Pages
- Document
Agricultural biotechnology development, policy and impacts in China
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002China is developing the largest plant biotechnology capacity outside North America and an impressive list of genetically modified (GM) crops under trial. However, underlying these achievements is a growing concern among policy-makers about the impact of the global biotechnology debate on China's agricultural trade.DocumentInnovation and policy process: case of transgenic sweet potato in Kenya
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002Biotechnology is being integrated into the existing science and technology policy process in Kenya. This process is embedded in the country's history of agricultural development, characterised by conventional technology, public goods research and centralised and hierarchical organisation.DocumentSmallholder access to biotechnology: case of Rhizobium inocula in Kenya
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002This paper explores the knowledge gap between science and production that the advent of biotechnology has made apparent in the smallholder agriculture.DocumentFood security and intellectual property rights in developing countries
International Environmental Law Research Centre, 2003This paper examines the implications of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on food security and the agricultural sector.DocumentDemocratising biotechnology: an overview
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper outlines the topics which are discussed further in the briefing series.DocumentFrom risks to rights: challenges for biotechnology policy
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper looks at the issues emerging within a rights approach to biotechnology regulation.DocumentPower-reversals in biotechnology: experiments in democratisation
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This briefing explores participatory processes in biotechnology. The paper argues that although GM varieties are claimed to have the potential to be part of packages that could reduce hunger and poverty, in reality, there has been little regard for the views or priorities of the farmers whose livelihoods they are meant to improve.DocumentBiotechnology for Africa?
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper asks if Africa should embrace the biotechnology revolution, especially GM crops; and whether biotechnology can succeed in addressing challenges such as declining crops and yields, chronic hunger and recurrent food crises.The paper looks at the experience of GM crops in Africa, particularly in Kenya, and argues that in order to make biotechnology work for African agriculture, technoloDocumentA biotech developmental state?: the Chinese experience
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This briefing paper looks at the achievements of, and the challenges to, biotechnology in China. In contrast to other countries, the state has determined the objectives and led the biotechnology process.DocumentBt cotton: benefits for poor farmers?
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper questions whether, on the basis of a few favourable studies and a few years' experience, Bt cotton (cotton genetically engineered to express the insecticidal toxin Bacillus Thuringiensis) can be relied upon to produce benefits for poor farmers.The paper identifies a number of implications:the positive results shown by Bt cotton in the first few years are likely to be highly cPages
