Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture Norway, Norway, Agriculture and food
Showing 191-200 of 288 results
Pages
- Document
The impact of HIV/AIDS on agriculture and strategies for coping with less labour
Development Fund, Norway, 2005This briefing note, based on studies done by UNAIDS and the UN Food and Agriculture organisation (FAO), looks at how HIV and AIDS impacts on agriculture, and contains recommendations for how to cope with the epidemic.The note states that increasingly, HIV and AIDS is having a major impact on nutrition, food security, agricultural production and rural societies throughout the affected countries.DocumentThe history of farmers' rights: a guide to central documents and literature
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2005This background study presents the findings of a comprehensive survey of documentation and literature on farmers rights. It is designed as a guide for negotiators, practitioners and researchers wishing to understand the concept and the potentials of farmers’ rights.The author does not provide analysis of literature but presents and summarises the material within four chapters.DocumentResults from an international stakeholder survey on farmers’ rights
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2005This background study presents the findings of an international stakeholder survey on farmers’ rights. The survey aims to facilitate a common understanding and develop an empirical basis for proposals to the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) on concrete measures to be taken to implement its provisions on this topic.DocumentDo the poor benefit from devolution policies: evidence from Malawi’s forest co-management program
Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2005This paper asks: do local people and in particular vulnerable groups benefit from the devolution of forest management? Although there are many studies that indicate village-level organisations have an impact in resource conservations, few have analysed the net benefits.DocumentThe future of Norway’s GSP system
Norwegian Institute for International Affairs, 2005This report provides a comprehensive review of the Norwegian Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) system, including options for change.The main recommendations from the report include:for manufacturing, tariffs should be reduced to zero on an MFN basis; i.e.DocumentProtected areas, wildlife conservation and local welfare
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2005This paper adds to the debate on the successfulness (or failure) of the establishment and expansion of protected wildlife areas in Africa. The author contributes to this debate by presenting a bio-economic analysis of protected area expansion.The model considers a hunter-agrarian community located on the border of a protected area.DocumentThe Norwegian import regime for agriculture
Norwegian Institute for International Affairs, 2005Norway maintains one of the highest levels of protection for agriculture in the OECD, but the tariff structure is not very transparent due to the extensive use of specific tariffs, or tariffs expressed in Norwegian kroner per kilogram.DocumentPolicy analysis for sustainable land management and food security in Ethiopia: a bioeconomic model with market imperfections
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2005This research in the highlands of Ethiopia shows how poverty and land degradation can be reduced in a resource-constrained agricultural area. It uses a bioeconomic model to address how alternative policy options can affect poverty and land degradation.DocumentExploring nature, wealth and power issues in agriculture and resource management: a case study on the Aga Khan Rural Support Program, northern Pakistan
Noragric, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2005This paper discusses the Aga Khan Rural Support Program’s (AKRSP) participatory and democratic approach to development in the northern areas of Pakistan.DocumentAwareness promotion and experience sharing on the implementation of the UNCCD-NAP to enhance pastoralist areas development in Ethiopia
Drylands Coordination Group, Norway, 2005This paper reports on a workshop held in Ethiopia in 2004, targeting stakeholders involved in implementing Ethiopia’s National Action Plan (NAP) for the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).Pages
