Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Environment, Biodiversity and environment
Showing 191-200 of 862 results
Pages
- Document
Ending African hunger: GM or agro-ecology?
Open Democracy, 2003This article counters the claim that biotechnology can address hunger in ways that are effective, affordable and safe. Taking an article by Gordon Conway as a starting point, the author addresses a number of key issues, arguing for the need for great caution before we encourage poor, vulnerable farmers to chance their livelihoods on GM crops.DocumentWho benefits from GM crops?
Friends of the Earth International, 2008This paper provides a fact-based assessment of Genetically Modified (GM) crops around the world.DocumentCross-sectoral toolkit for the conservation and sustainable management of forest biodiversity
Convention on Biological Diversity, 2008The pressures from sectors such as agriculture, mining, or energy on forest biodiversity require cross-sectoral approaches for the conservation and sustainable management of forests. This tool-kit summarises information on policy approaches that aim to minimize the negative impacts of other sectoral policies on forests and forest biodiversity.DocumentThe conservation and use of wildlife-based resources: the bushmeat crisis
Convention on Biological Diversity, 2008This paper addresses the hunting of tropical forest wildlife for food (known as “bushmeat”, “wildmeat” and/or “gamemeat”). It argues that this is an issue of concern primarily for three reasons:DocumentHuman-wildlife conflicts over food and water in Tanzania
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2008Conflicts between humans and wildlife are a growing problem. People kill wild animals, or reduce their habitats, to retaliate over the loss of human life, the destruction of crops, and competition for land, water and other resources. Previous studies have looked at human-wildlife conflicts from a conservation perspective; few have focused on the impacts on people’s food security.DocumentWhich way forward for food security in Afghanistan?
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2008Afghanistan has been the focus of international relief and aid efforts for over ten years. Many of these efforts have been short term and focused on responding to crises. Recently, donors have emphasised the need for long-term planning in agriculture and food security. What can be done to support food security in Afghanistan?DocumentGM in India: the battle over Bt cotton
SciDev.Net, 2006This article explores the chequered history of GM technology in India, arguing that much of the country's GM debate (the polarised opinions of the pro-GM government and industry and anti-GM activists) stems from the introduction of Bt cotton into India by US biotech giant Monsanto in 1995. The authors argues that Bt cotton, contrary to the positive picture of Bt cotton's impacts painted by theDocumentEcological impact of GM crops: time for a sober scientific assessment
Science in Africa, 2004Assessing the environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops requires more than just a tunnel vision approach which looks at hypothetical risks, this article argues.DocumentProtecting farmers' rights in the global IPR regime
South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics & Environment, 2007In developing countries, the vast majority of farmers still act as stewards and innovators of genetic diversity and farmers' rights are about enabling this to continue and rewarding them for their contribution to the global genetic pool.DocumentGM crops: biotech agriculture: time to take GM seriously
Ethical Corporation Online, 2008Biotechnology companies assert that genetically modified crops enable better pest control, reduced spraying, safety for non-target species, higher stress tolerance and more consistent yields. In short, the industry believes that green biotechnologies provide a secure and sustainable food and energy solution.Pages
