Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Global Governance, Governance in South Africa
Showing 21-30 of 42 results
Pages
- Document
BRICS: emergence of health agenda
International Organisations Research Institute, 2014Health is an indispensable public good. At the national level, it has been manifested in the commitment of the BRICS members of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to scale up health financing. At the global level, it is evidenced by the international community progress on the three health-related Millennium Development Goals.DocumentAchieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in Africa
Centre for Conflict Resolution, University of Cape Town (UCT), 2013Progress towards achieving the Goals has been slow, but far from uniform across Africa.DocumentThe G-20 and development: ensuring greater African participation
South African Institute of International Affairs, 2014Although South Africa is the only African permanent member of the G-20 group of major economies, the G-20 regularly invites the chair of the African Union (AU) and a representative of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) – usually the chair of the Heads of State and Government Orientation Committee – to attend its meetings.DocumentWill the BRICS provide the global public goods the world needs?
Overseas Development Institute, 2014The demand for global economic governance is increasing in a globalising and increasingly interlinked economy. Yet global governance, a global public good, is currently undersupplied – and this (e.g. lack of global rules on trade, finance and emissions) is harming development.DocumentImplementing the responsibility to protect: new directions for international peace and security?
Igarape Institute, 2013The international peace and security architecture is undergoing a profound renovation in the twenty first century. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine is being re-evaluated from political and operational perspectives, while the Responsibility while Protecting (RwP), a Brazilian initiative, can be a new direction for international peace and security.DocumentBalancing competing obligations: the Rome Statute and AU decisions
Institute for Security Studies, 2011This paper underlines the claimed conflict between African states’ binding obligations imposed by the Rome Statute and their binding obligations imposed by the decisions of the African Union (AU).Document'Keep calm and carry on': an initial African assessment of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) 2010 Review Conference
Institute for Security Studies, 2010States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) adopted a final document at its 8th Review Conference in 2010. This paper review that document from an African perspective.DocumentThe chair of the African Union: what prospect for institutionalisation?
Institute for Security Studies, 2010The chair of the Pan-African organisation (PAO) is one position that can be scrutinised and defined with difficulty. Its real political and institutional significance can only be appraised through a historical analysis because it is an institution that has evolved through practical engagements.DocumentAfrican efforts to close the impunity gap: lessons for complementarity from national and regional actions
Institute for Security Studies, 2012The aim of this paper is to highlight some of the successes and challenges of domestic and regional international criminal justice processes in Africa.DocumentImplications of the AU decision to give the African Court jurisdiction over international crimes
Institute for Security Studies, 2012In 2010, the African Union (AU) Commission appointed consultants to work on drafting an amended protocol on the Statute of the African Court (AC). The amended protocol was approved in 2012. The paper shows that the amendment provides for the expansion of the jurisdiction of the AC to deal with specific criminal matters.Pages