Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture and food, Biotechnology and GMOs, Biotechnology and GMOs governance
Showing 21-30 of 145 results
Pages
- Document
GM crops and developing countries: a UK food group briefing, July 2003
UK Food Group, 2003This short two page briefing argues that in most developing countries, whose small-scale, labour-intensive agriculture is dramatically different from the UK, GM crops are at best irrelevant and at worst can threaten local food production.OrganisationBiofuelwatch
Biofuelwatch is a volunteer-led campaign group that campaigns against the use of bioenergy from unsustainable sources, i.e.DocumentWho benefits from GM crops?
Friends of the Earth International, 2008This paper provides a fact-based assessment of Genetically Modified (GM) crops around the world.DocumentGM in India: the battle over Bt cotton
SciDev.Net, 2006This article explores the chequered history of GM technology in India, arguing that much of the country's GM debate (the polarised opinions of the pro-GM government and industry and anti-GM activists) stems from the introduction of Bt cotton into India by US biotech giant Monsanto in 1995. The authors argues that Bt cotton, contrary to the positive picture of Bt cotton's impacts painted by theDocumentThe adoption and economics of Bt cotton in India: preliminary results from a study
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, 2006This paper presents preliminary results from a study of the economics and adoption of Bt cotton in India. Biotech crops, which made their appearance in the world about a decade ago, have gained substantial popularity and acceptance in many parts of the world including US, China, Australia, Mexico, Argentina and South Africa.DocumentEcological impact of GM crops: time for a sober scientific assessment
Science in Africa, 2004Assessing the environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops requires more than just a tunnel vision approach which looks at hypothetical risks, this article argues.DocumentTen years of genetically modified crops in Argentine agriculture
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (National Institute for Agricultural Technology), Argentina, 2006Argentina is the world's second largest producer of genetically modified (GM) crops, after the United States, with over 17 million hectares planted. This paper explores the assertion that the introduction of GM crops into Argentinian agriculture represents a turning point not only for the farm sector but for the economy as a whole.DocumentTarnishing silver bullets: Bt technology adoption, bounded rationality and the outbreak of secondary pest infestations in China
GRAIN, 2006The adoption of Bt cotton has had a huge impact on global cotton production. Many studies have focused on the potentially positive impact of Bt and the savings on pesticides targeting primary pests. However, in China, growing secondary pest populations have slowly eroded the benefits of Bt technology.DocumentCan the poor help GM crops? Technology, representation and cotton in the Makhathini Flats, South Africa
GRAIN, 2006The adoption of genetically modified (GM) cotton in South Africa’s Makhathini Flats in 1998 was heralded as a case in which agricultural biotechnology could benefit smallholder farmers, and a model for the rest of the continent to follow.DocumentBales and balance: a review of the methods used to assess the economic impact of Bt cotton on farmers in developing economies
AgBioForum, 2006This paper assesses 47 peer-reviewed articles that have applied stated economic methods to measure the farm-level impacts of Bt cotton in developing agriculture from 1996. The authors focus on methods, although findings are also contrasted and compared in qualitative terms.Pages
