Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Climate change, Climate change governance
Showing 221-230 of 717 results
Pages
- Document
The foreign policy of carbon sinks: carbon capture and storage as foreign policy in Norway
Science Direct, 2014Norway is among a handful of countries with an explicit policy to promote carbon capture and storage (CCS) at both national and international levels. This paper investigates the internal and external driving forces behind Norway's efforts to advance CCS as a global climate change mitigation option.DocumentREDD+ as performance-based aid: general lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway
2013REDD+, when it officially became part of the international climate agenda in 2007, was an idea about payment to countries and projects for reducing emission from forests, with funding primarily from carbon markets.DocumentREDD+ in India: managing carbon storage and biodiversity safeguarding in national forest politics?
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2014The report analyses India's approach towards the mechanism on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhance-ment of forest carbon stocks (REDD+), with particular attention to India's handling of both carbon and biodiversity matters.DocumentA legally binding agreement (LBA) - growing need for air pollution reduction and control in South Asia
Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Pakistan, 2011Environmental degradation remains a challenge in most South Asian countries. With increased industrial activity, the exponential growth in number of vehicles and population, the contribution of each country to the south Asia regional air pollution is expected to increase over time.DocumentEnvironmental challenges and constraints to policy issues for sustainable industrial development in Pakistan
Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Pakistan, 2012Like most of other south Asian countries, traditionally, Pakistan’s economy has been centered on agriculture. However, in the recent past, manufacturing and services have also emerged as major contributing sectors. The share of manufacturing sector, from 18.3% in 2007 to 30% by 2030, has been envisioned in Vision 2030.DocumentSystematic Review Approach to identifying key trends in adaptation governance at the supranational level
Climate Change Agriculture Food Security, 2014This working paper from CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) analyses literature on adaptation governance focused on food security at the supranational level.DocumentThe State of REDD+ Finance
Center for Global Development, USA, 2014This paper presents a thorough synthesis of available data to illuminate the current global state of finance for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+). It adds to a growing body of work that seeks to understand the size and composition of finance for REDD+ initiatives, as well as the delivery of climate finance more generally.DocumentThe comparative turn in climate change adaptation and food security governance research
Climate Change Agriculture Food Security, 2014This working paper from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) proposes that concepts and methods of comparative politics can shine light on political factors important for catalysing positive change on the governance, climate change adaptation and food security of countries in the developing world.DocumentREDD-plus Finance Briefing Paper
Overseas Development Institute, 2014This brief looks at Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation plus conservation (REDD+) finance. Seven major bilateral and multilateral funding initiatives have been recently created to support REDD+. Brazil has received the largest volume of REDD+ finance through its Amazon Fund.DocumentClimate finance:is it making a difference? A review of the effectiveness of Multilateral Climate Funds
Overseas Development Institute, 2014International efforts to tackle climate change are at a critical juncture. This report provides a critical review of the climate finance architecture. It examines more than a decade of experience of multilateral climate funds including the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Climate Investment Funds (CIFs), and the Adaptation Fund (AF).Pages
