Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture and food, Biotechnology and GMOs, Trade Policy
Showing 31-40 of 71 results
Pages
- Document
Biotechnology and food security in Africa: some policy and institutional considerations
International Environmental Law Research Centre, 2002This paper asks how biotechnology can affect food security in Africa. It advices caution in either promoting or opposing biotechnology for its own sake.The paper argues that:no technology by and of itself has internal momentum to create food security for any society of region. It is how the technology is applied and moulded by society that determines its usefulness.DocumentGM crops: going against the grain
ActionAid International, 2003This paper asks: Do GM crops help eradicate poverty? Do GM crops meet the needs of poor farmers? Do they threaten basic rights? Do GM crops threaten biodiversity? Do GM crops enhance informed choice and participation for poor people?Conclusion: The widespread adoption of GM crops seems likely to exacerbate the underlying causes of food insecurity, leading to more hungry people, not fewer.DocumentGlobalisation and the international governance of modern biotechnology: the implications for food security in Kenya
International Environmental Law Research Centre, 2003This paper argues that for modern biotechnology research to have long term and wider positive social impact in Kenya, changes in policies and institutions must be implemented to ensure that it benefits the smallholder farmers who make up the majority of Kenya’s population.Critical issues examined include:biosafety food safetyloss of biodiversity IPRsThe report makesDocumentTrade in genetically modified food: a survey of empirical studies
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2002This paper analyses the current and potential economic impact of GM commodities on world trade.It concludes that: in general, adopters of the more productive GM technologies gain, while non-adopters or GM-critical regions either do not gain at all or only gain some (through changes in world prices), depending on how strongly they segment their markets.DocumentISF view on intellectual property
International Seed Federation, 2002This position paper from the International Seed Federation, an industry body, sets out the position of its members on IP protection for plant breeders and other related issues. ISF members are, not surprisingly, unanimously in favour of a strong IP protection.The federation considers that both ‘sui generis’ and patent style systems are legitimate.DocumentIPRs, biotechnology and food security
Gapresearch.org, IDS, 2002This paper examines the development and enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) at the international and national level and the impacts of IPRs on biotechnology, agricultural practices and food security concerns in the context of globalisation.DocumentBiotechnology and the issues interconnected with and through it
Biowatch South Africa, 2002This paper takes a step back from the policy issues surrounding biotechnology and its role in development to present a broad discussion of the biotechnology sector and its implications.The paper argues that if biotechnology is to develop usefully, the risks involved with it should be prevented.DocumentPolicy, national regulation, and international standards for GM foods
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2003The adoption of biotechnology and the introduction of GM foods into the international marketplace has exacerbated an already difficult area of trade policy. As biotechnology increases productive capacity in various products, it also increases the need to trade. But diverging national regulations are increasingly impeding trade in these products creating market distortions.DocumentBenefits and shortcomings of intellectual property rights for small scale farmers in developing countries
Agricultural Information and Documentation Service for Development Cooperation, 2002Rafael Mariano from the Peasant Movement of the Philippines presents his case arguing that intellectual property rights, and more broadly science, have been co-opted by business interests (supported by the US) to strengthen their control over agricultural production and to open up new markets at the expense of small farmers and developing countries.In particular he argues: The 1991 ActDocumentModern biotechnology and developing-world agriculture
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002This essay provides and introduction to agricultural biotechnology in a developing country context. The author looks at issues of food security, consumer acceptance, sectoral change and regulation in the context of advances in genomics and bioinformatics which have led to an increase in the rate and volume of advances in the biotech.Pages
