Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Intellectual Property Rights, Trade Policy
Showing 381-390 of 420 results
Pages
- Document
Compensating local communities for conserving biodiversity: how much, who will, how and when
Society for Research and Initiatives for Sustainable Technologies and Institutions, 1999Large number of local communities across the world have shared unhesitatingly their knowledge about local biodiversity and its different uses with outsiders including researchers, corporations, gene collectors and of course, activists. Many continue to share despite knowing that by withholding this knowledge they could receive pecuniary advantage.DocumentBiopiracy, TRIPS and the Patenting of Asia's Rice Bowl: A collective NGO situationer on IPRs on rice
GRAIN, 1998Nearly all Asian countries are committed to the WTO TRIPs treaty. This means that by the year 2000, Asian governments have to make intellectual property titles on seeds completely legal. This will favor transnational corporations who want to control agriculture and the world's food system through genetic engineering.DocumentSignposts To Sui Generis Rights: Resource materials from the international seminar on sui generis rights
GRAIN, 1997TRIPS requires developing countries to enact intellectual property rights (IPR) legislation for plant varieties by the year 2000, while least-developed countries have until 2005. This can be in the form of classic industrial patent systems or some "effective sui generis system".DocumentTen reasons not to join UPOV [Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants]
GRAIN, 1998Developing countries are currently facing intense pressure to institute intellectual property rights (IPRs) for plant varieties. Despite the fact that the brief history of IPRs over plants and biological resources has undermined local biodiversity in the North and precipitated corporate monopolies over the food system, Southern countries are being forced to travel the same path.DocumentIndustrial Reliance on Biodiversity
UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1997Overview of the extent to which industry in the developed world relies on the biodiversity of the developing world. Primitive human societies rely almost entirely on wild species for food, draught, building materials and other products, and such direct use continues in modern society.DocumentBiodiversity and the appropriation of women's knowledge
Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor - Indigenous Knowledge WorldWide, 1997In the past few years research institutions and development organizations have 'discovered' the relevance of men farmers' indigenous knowledge of genetic resource management and, after some delay, that of women farmers as well. At the same time, attention has been drawn to the global need to conserve biological diversity.DocumentBiotechnology in Crops: Issues for the developing world
Oxfam, 1998Overview of issues and actors in the debate on genetically modified crops.DocumentSelling Suicide: farming, false promises and genetic engineering in developing countries
Christian Aid, 1999Experience shows that large gaps between rich and poor, ownership of resources concentrated in too few hands, and a food supply based on too few varieties of crops, are the classic preconditions for hunger and famine. New technologies are taking us further down this ill-advised farm track.DocumentNew technologies and the global race for knowledge
Human Development Report Office, UNDP, 1999The recent great strides in technology present tremendous opportunities for human developmenbut achieving that potential depends on how technology is used.DocumentProperty rights, collective action and technologies for natural resource management: a conceptual framework
CGIAR System-wide Program on Property Rights and Collective Action, 1998Explores how the institutions of property rights and collective action play a particularly important role in the application of technologies for agricultural and natural resource management.Technologies with long time frames tend to require tenure security to provide sufficient incentives for adoption, while those that operate on a large spatial scale will require collective action to coordinatPages
