Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Climate change, Climate change Forestry
Showing 391-400 of 534 results
Pages
- Document
Declaration on Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples of El Salvador
2009Declaration of the Salvadoran Indigenous National Coordinator Council -CCNIS- (October 2009) in face of international negotiations on climate change.DocumentDesigning a REDD+ Program that Benefits Forestry Communities in Mesoamerica Synthesis Report
Programa Salvadoreño de investigación sobre desarrollo y medio mmbiente, 2011This paper is an integrated synthesis of the primary results of the project ―Designing a REDD Program that Benefits Forestry Communities in Mesoamerica, implemented from October 2009 to September 2010 by Fundación PRISMA and Grupo CABAL, with funding from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Ford Foundation.DocumentPrioritizing food security and livelihoods in climate change mitigation mechanisms: Experiences and opportunities for smallholder coffee agroforestry, forest communities and REDD+
Programa Salvadoreño de investigación sobre desarrollo y medio mmbiente, 2011This policy brief examines mechanisms to change land use patterns in order to reduce carbon emissions, or promote carbon capture and storage in the light of new research on smallholder coffee agroforestry, recent evidence on sustainable forest management, and experiences with reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation, forest conservation, sustainable management of forests, and the enhanDocumentCompensation for ecosystem services: Directions, potentials and pitfalls for rural communities
Programa Salvadoreño de investigación sobre desarrollo y medio mmbiente, 2011Payment for environmental services has rapidly gained worldwide attention as an instrument for promoting conservation and addressing rural poverty, nevertheless, the practice has demonstrated that these schemes have important limitations.DocumentCambodia REDD+ capacity building services assessment
The Centre for People and Forests, 2012In the past three years, tropical forested countries across the world have taken important institutional, policy, legal and piloting steps to become ready for REDD+. Capacity building is a key component of this REDD+ readiness process, which is backed by investments from a large number of organisations, government agencies, communities and individuals.DocumentIndonesia REDD+ capacity building services assessment
The Centre for People and Forests, 2012Capacity building and training efforts have transformed REDD+ from a little-known concept to an issue that is widely recognised, discussed and on the agenda of the government of Indonesia.DocumentPhilippines REDD+ capacity building services assessment
The Centre for People and Forests, 2012Building capacity for implementing REDD+ is a key component of REDD+ readiness processes that have been underway for over three years. Backed by substantial funding from a large number of organisations, government agencies and individuals, a multitude of organisations are conducting awareness raising and training activities in all REDD+ nations.DocumentViet Nam REDD+ capacity building services assessment
The Centre for People and Forests, 2012This country report assesses organisations providing REDD+ capacity building services in Vietnam. The report identifies gaps in key areas that need to be filled in order for Vietnam to meet the objectives of its Draft National REDD+ programme.DocumentYasuni-ITT Initiative: A big idea from a small country
2009This document describes the Yasuni-ITT Initiative from the Government of Ecuador, that proposes the establishment of a Trust Fund in order to maintain the crude oil in the ITT field indefinitely underground, in order to put social and environmental values first, and was exploring other ways to benefit the country economically.DocumentREDD+ and the Indigenous Question: A Case Study from Ecuador
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2011One of the main issues regarding the implementation of REDD+ in Latin America has been the growing concern that such projects may infringe upon the rights and negatively affect the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities. Various indigenous and civil society organizations are ardently opposed to the initiative.Pages
