Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Livelihoods, Livelihoods social protection, Cash transfers, Poverty, Social protection
Showing 41-50 of 72 results
Pages
- Document
Evaluation study on appropriate models of livelihood strategies for social protection in Zambia
Wahenga, Regional Hunger and Vulnerability Programme, 2007Due to serious deterioration of socio-economic conditions in Zambia, the government is considering the adoption of a national Social Protection Strategy. This report examines Zambian and international livelihood approaches that target low capacity and incapacitated households. It provides the following:DocumentReforming cash-based social assistance in Serbia
Oxford Policy Management, 2007The Government of Serbia intends to increase the number of poor who are covered by social assistance and to better target cash transfers to the poor. This briefing note summarises key findings on the opportunities of reform of two main cash benefits; child allowances and material support for low income households (MOP). Key points that emerge from programme evaluations include:DocumentSocial protection and cash transfers in Uganda: frequently asked questions on cash transfers
Chronic Poverty Research Centre, UK, 2007This brief attempts to answer some of the most frequently asked questions about the cash transfer scheme piloted by Uganda’s Ministry of Gender Labor and Social Development (MGLSD), with funding support from UK’s Department for International Development (DFID). These include:DocumentThe impact of unconditional cash transfers on nutrition: the South African Child Support Grant
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, 2007This paper estimates the impact of South Africa’s Child Support Grant (CSG) on child nutrition as measured by child height-for-age. It finds that large dosages of CSG treatment early in life significantly boosts child height.DocumentTackling obstacles to social protection for chronically poor people
Chronic Poverty Research Centre, UK, 2007This briefing paper examines some of the negative perceptions of social protection transfers. It focuses specifically on cash transfers since these tend to receive most criticism. Some of the findings and recommendations include:DocumentDeveloping social protection in Tanzania within a context of generalised insecurity
Research on Poverty Alleviation, Tanzania, 2006Research on Poverty Alleviation’s (REPOA) is a leading development research centre in Tanzania. This paper outlines REPOA’s programme for social protection. It provides a conceptual framework and sets out the overall agenda for the programme. Research themes put forward include:• protecting income against impoverishment: transfers and consumption smoothingDocumentThe Malawi social cash transfer scheme: preliminary lessons learned
United Nations Children's Fund, 2006Evidence from a pilot social cash transfer programme in Malawi indicates that it is a cost-effective, quick way to meet the basic needs of ultra-poor households whose members are unable to work.DocumentReducing child poverty with cash transfers: a sure thing?
Consortium for Street Children, 2006Can cash transfer programmes targeted at children be effective in reducing childhood poverty? This article examines the effectiveness of three types of cash transfer programmes.DocumentLessons from a direct welfare transfer intervention: a pilot project by Concern Universal in Malawi
Concern Universal International, Malawi, 2006This briefing paper documents the lessons learnt from the Dedza Safety Nets Pilot Project (DSNPP) in Malawi. The DSNPP compared the impact of all three DWT systems, i.e. cash, voucher and in-kind transfers on chronic poverty and vulnerability within a non-emergency context. The project aimed to compare the impact of all three DWT systems, i.e.DocumentWhere is education in the conditional cash transfers of education?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2006This paper examines the educational effects of conditional cash transfers (CCT) for education. The study finds that based on the evidence reviewed in this paper, there is very limited support for the conclusion that CCTs are effective educational instruments, in particular with regards to their ability to increase learning.Pages
