Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Intellectual Property Rights, Trade Policy
Showing 401-410 of 420 results
Pages
- Document
TRIPS versus biodiversity: what to do with the 1999 review of Article 27.3(b)
GRAIN, 1999This paper summarises GRAIN’s view of what should be done with TRIPS Article 27.3(b) during its 1999 Review.DocumentPeople, plants, and patents: the impact of intellectual property on trade, plant biodiversity, and rural society
International Development Research Centre, 1994The purpose of this book is to identify key IPR issues and choices and to describe the broader context within which decisions are being made.DocumentThe sustainable development effects of the WTO TRIPS Agreement: a focus on developing countries
Trade, Investment and Sustainable Development Programme, IISD, 1996Examines the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and tries to analyse those areas in which the Agreement will impact, either positively or negatively, on sustainable development in developing countries such as Pakistan.DocumentTrade, intellectual property, food and biodiversity: key issues and options for the 1999 review of Article 27.3(b)of the TRIPS Agreement
Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project, MSU, 1999This discussion paper reviews the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the impact of the current multilateral Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) regime, on plants and animals, on plant variety protection systems, and on food security and agricultural biodiversity.DocumentOptions for the implementation of farmers' rights at the national level
South Centre, 2000One of the main objectives of Farmers' Rights is to allow farmers, their communities, and countries in all regions, fully to participate in the benefits derived, at present and in the future, from the improved use of Plant Genetic Resources, through plant breeding and other scientific methods.DocumentFarmers and seed
Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 2001The theme of this Monitor issue is the involvement of farmers in seed production and development. Chapters are written by various experts.While Joshi examines the weakness of formal seed systems, he also highlights how formal systems can complement breeding efforts of farmers. However, Participatory Plant Breeding (PPB) is still relatively new and many things remain to be explored.DocumentProprietary biotechnology inputs and international agricultural research
International Service for National Agricultural Research, 1998This Briefing Paper presents the most important findings and lessons of a study into the magnitude of, and procedures for, the use of inputs protected by IPR at selected international agricultural research centers (IARCs). It highlights the challenging environment in which agricultural research organisations are working with regard to biotechnology.DocumentReport of the workshop on differential pricing and financing of essential drugs
World Trade Organization, 2001Differential pricing could, and should, play an important role in ensuring access to existing essential drugs at affordable prices, especially in poor countries, while allowing the patent system to continue to play its role of providing incentives for research and development into new drugs.DocumentFormula for fairness: patient rights before patent rights
Oxfam, 2001Paper offers a brief profile of Pfizer, and describes the depth of the divide between poor and rich countries in the incidence of disease and premature death and in levels of access to affordable life-saving medicines. It then outlines the TRIPS regime, which, they state, greatly strengthens drug companies 'patent protection in developing countries.DocumentIntellectual property rights and international R&D competition
International Monetary Fund, 2001Uses a model of repeated patent races to examine the incentives for intellectual property protection, and the effects of such protection both locally and on a country's trading partners. A partial equilibrium analysis is conducted in the context of international R&D competition between two countries both sufficiently technologically advanced to engage in innovative activities.Pages
