Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Technology and innovation in agriculture, Agriculture and food
Showing 411-420 of 616 results
Pages
- Document
Tracing policy connections: the politics of knowledge in the Green Revolution and biotechnology eras in India
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper compares policy making in the "Green Revolution" and "biotechnology" eras to explore the dynamic interaction of global and more local knowledge about agriculture, food and rural development.The paper argues that the biotechnology era is unquestionably different from the Green Revolution, in a number of key respects: the nature and complexity of policy narratives associated wiDocumentGlobalisation and the international governance of modern biotechnology: development of IPR regime in India with reference to agricultural biotechnology
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper looks at debates over the evolution of the IPRs regime in India as it relates to agricultural biotechnology.DocumentIntellectual property rights, biotechnology and food security
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper examines the relationship between food security, agricultural biotechnology and intellectual property rights (IPRs), particularly for developing countries and poorer groups within those countries.Main findings include:for low income developing countries, the costs of strengthening IPRs may well outweigh the gainspro-IPR industry representatives and trade officials, with pDocumentRights and risk: challenging biotechnology policy in Zimbabwe
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2003This paper looks at how a rights based approach can be applied to biotechnology policy. Drawing on the experience of Zimbabwe and other countries in southern Africa, this paper argues that a risk based approach to biotechnology regulation creates an artificial divide between civil and political rights and economic, social and cultural rights.DocumentContexts for regulation: GMOs in Zimbabwe
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2003This paper looks at the regulation of biotechnology in Zimbabwe.DocumentBiotech firms, biotech politics: negotiating GMOs in India
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2003This paper explores the different corporate strategies of firms in the biotech and seed sectors and looks at how they have organised themselves to influence the policy process.The paper suggests the importance of looking at divisions within capital and the political alliances that firms form as a basis for understanding the ways in which policy choices are framed and decisions taken.DocumentSeeds in a globalised world: agricultural biotechnology in Zimbabwe
Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2003This paper looks at what biotechnology might mean for agricultural and food production systems in Zimbabwe and looks at some of the strategic questions that lie behind decisions to go the GM route in agriculture.Several factors are identified and discussed including:technology choiceissues of technology access and ownershipthe role of new farmers emerging as a result of land refDocumentRegulating biotechnology in China: the politics of biosafety
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper examines the politics of biosafety regulation in China and policy processes around Genetically Modified (GM) crops.The paper:locates biosafety debates in wider contexts, both in terms of what is happening in China in biotechnology, and in terms of the global politics of biosafety.DocumentBt cotton benefits, costs and impacts in China
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper provides a follow up study, 2000/1, of the effect of Bt cotton adoption in China, 1999.Main findings include:the production Bt cotton has positive crop yield impacts, shifting the crop yield frontier by nearly 10 percentBt cotton farmers increased their incomes by reducing use of pesticides and labour inputsBt cotton continues to have positive environmental and healthDocumentBiotechnology policy and regulation in China
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper refutes claims that China has in recent years fundamentally altered its stance on GMOs in response to trade, food safety and environmental biosafety concerns.Pages
